| Author |
Message
|
| santosh.veerlapati |
 Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 4:59 am Post subject: Batch size attribute and time taken for the message to tramt |
 |
|
Voyager
Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Posts: 87
|
Hi
I have changed the batch size attribute on the sender channel and observed the transmission time taken for 50 messages which are having size of 1.5MB each, from source to the destination queue manager.
For BatchSize 1
It took 16 mins
For BatchSize 3
It took 13 mins
For BatchSize 6
It took 8 mins
For BatchSize 9
It took 7 mins
at the same bandwidhth and network conditions
but i m surprised to realize how the batch size attribute can heavily effect the transmission time
can anybody explain me on this
thanks in advance
santosh kumar veelrapati |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 5:14 am Post subject: Re: Batch size attribute and time taken for the message to t |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| santosh.veerlapati wrote: |
| i m surprised to realize how the batch size attribute can heavily effect the transmission time |
Why? 
| santosh.veerlapati wrote: |
| can anybody explain me on this |
The product documentation can. Common sense probably gives some clues.
There are also some tuning & performance papers on the IBM site you might find interesting reading.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| santosh.veerlapati |
| Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 5:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Posts: 87
|
I already went throught the documentation, i know it effects the time but i wont think it will be making minutes of difference , thats why i got surprised.
Thanks
Santosh Kumar Veerlaapti |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| santosh.veerlapati wrote: |
| i wont think it will be making minutes of difference , thats why i got surprised. |
Then you'll find the performance papers well worth a read. Batch size is a key tuning attribute.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| santosh.veerlapati wrote: |
| i wont think it will be making minutes of difference , thats why i got surprised. |
Then you'll find the performance papers well worth a read. Batch size is a key tuning attribute. |
 But remember that batch size is also a key tuning parameter depending on the quality of your connection (noise, interference, etc...) 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 5:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| fjb_saper wrote: |
| Vitor wrote: |
| santosh.veerlapati wrote: |
| i wont think it will be making minutes of difference , thats why i got surprised. |
Then you'll find the performance papers well worth a read. Batch size is a key tuning attribute. |
But remember that batch size is also a key tuning parameter depending on the quality of your connection (noise, interference, etc...) |
Very important point.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
