| Author |
Message
|
| Shalini |
 Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 6:47 am Post subject: Reply PCF message to DLQ by amqpcsea RC :2052 |
 |
|
Master
Joined: 30 Apr 2002
Posts: 224
Location: India
|
Hi,
MQ 5.3 on Solaris 2.6 using Java application with PCF:
We have developed a application which checks the status of "n" channel, by sending a PCF command to the remote queue manager(QM1).
In Dead letter Queue of QM1 we are messages as.
UserID:root
PutApplicationType :amqpcsea
MessageType:Reply
Non Persistance
Reason :2052
DestinationQ:AMQ.40ED3BF7019B6523
Original Format :MQADMIN
Would like to know why these reply messages come to the dead letter queue of QM1, is there any way to avoid this problem.
Destination Queue seems to be a dynamic queue.
The frequency of message to the DLQ is not consistent.
Our Channel status java application runs as a windows service in some remote node other than the node where QM1 is running.
Any clue 
Last edited by Shalini on Tue Jul 20, 2004 6:50 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 6:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
| Messages Manual wrote: |
2052 X'0804' MQRC_Q_DELETED
An Hobj queue handle specified on a call refers to a dynamic queue that has been deleted since the queue was opened.
On z/OS, this can also occur with the MQOPEN and MQPUT1 calls if a dynamic queue is being opened, but the queue is in a logically-deleted state. See MQCLOSE for more information about this.
Corrective action: Issue an MQCLOSE call to return the handle and associated resources to the system (the MQCLOSE call will succeed in this case). Check the design of the application that caused the error.
|
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Shalini |
| Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 30 Apr 2002
Posts: 224
Location: India
|
Thanks for your kind reply.
For your kind information, we are not using any queues. We are just trying to check the status of each channels in QM1.
But what you have answered/mentioned MQClose refers to a opened Queue.
So, Kindly do the needful.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
I'm confused.
Are you creating a PCF message that is supposed to inquire as to the status of channels?
Don't you need a valid reply-to queue for that inquiry to provide an answer?
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| gerimqseries |
| Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 12:29 am Post subject: $ Message in DLQ |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 03 Aug 2009
Posts: 30
|
Hi,
I got a similar situation, but not for every message, the saveqmgr script runs from crontab every day at 18:00.
OS: AIX
Message DLH in DLQ:
Reason: MQRC_Q_DELETED
Dest. q: SAVEQMGR.4A5706EC20573F02
put a.n.: amqpcsea
Message data: $
Why is it happen?
How can I avoid this?
Thanks a lot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Mr Butcher |
| Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Padawan
Joined: 23 May 2005
Posts: 1716
|
you should either follow the description of the error message (Check the design of the application that caused the error) of migrate to a supported MQ version. What fix pak is applied on the MQ V5.3 system?
_________________
Regards, Butcher |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 2:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| Shalini wrote: |
Thanks for your kind reply.
For your kind information, we are not using any queues. We are just trying to check the status of each channels in QM1.
But what you have answered/mentioned MQClose refers to a opened Queue.
So, Kindly do the needful. |
This is a very rude way to ask someone to do your job for you.
The 'needful' is for you to understand that the dynamic queue, which your application has specified, no longer exists by the time the REPLY message returns. Either increase the time out in the application, make the queue a perm dyn, or use a vanilla QL.
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 2:11 am Post subject: Re: $ Message in DLQ |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| gerimqseries wrote: |
Hi,
I got a similar situation, but not for every message, the saveqmgr script runs from crontab every day at 18:00.
OS: AIX
Message DLH in DLQ:
Reason: MQRC_Q_DELETED
Dest. q: SAVEQMGR.4A5706EC20573F02
put a.n.: amqpcsea
Message data: $
Why is it happen?
How can I avoid this?
Thanks a lot. |
Are you using saveqmgrc?
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| gerimqseries |
| Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 03 Aug 2009
Posts: 30
|
No, only saveqmgr (without c)
Maybe it is version problem??? I do not think so, sometimes I do not have messages in DLQ.
SAVEQMGR V6.0.2
# dspmqver
Name: WebSphere MQ
Version: 6.0.2.3
CMVC level: p600-203-080123
BuildType: IKAP - (Production) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 2:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| gerimqseries wrote: |
No, only saveqmgr (without c)
Maybe it is version problem??? I do not think so, sometimes I do not have messages in DLQ.
SAVEQMGR V6.0.2
# dspmqver
Name: WebSphere MQ
Version: 6.0.2.3
CMVC level: p600-203-080123
BuildType: IKAP - (Production) |
Maybe it's a timing issue? (supposition). Contact the 'owner' of the MS03 SupportPac (he may along in a bit anyway as he answered an earlier post) for help on that.
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Mr Butcher |
| Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Padawan
Joined: 23 May 2005
Posts: 1716
|
this morning you wrote
and now your dspmqver shows 6.0.2.3? really fast upgrade, excellent.  or is this a different machine?
_________________
Regards, Butcher |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| Mr Butcher wrote: |
| this morning you wrote
and now your dspmqver shows 6.0.2.3? really fast upgrade, excellent. or is this a different machine? |
No, it's a different poster
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Mr Butcher |
| Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Padawan
Joined: 23 May 2005
Posts: 1716
|
haha uhm 
_________________
Regards, Butcher |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 5:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
| Quote: |
| We have developed a application... |
You could post your application source code here so we could take a look at it.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bbburson |
| Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 06 Jan 2004
Posts: 378
Location: Nowhere near a queue manager
|
| exerk wrote: |
| Mr Butcher wrote: |
| this morning you wrote
and now your dspmqver shows 6.0.2.3? really fast upgrade, excellent. or is this a different machine? |
No, it's a different poster |
...AND a five-year time gap; this recent discussion really should have been opened as a new topic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
