Author |
Message
|
Sam Uppu |
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 7:46 am Post subject: What to do on MQ side if the app uses WAS as JMS provider? |
|
|
 Yatiri
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 610
|
Hi Guys,
We are using MQ version 7 and WAS 6.
My understanding is if we use WAS, we no need to do anything on MQ side other than creating normal queues.
On the WAS side, they have to map the MQ queues with their JMS queues in JNDI Bindings file.
Can you guys confirm?.
Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
velocity |
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 30 Nov 2007 Posts: 126
|
There is nothing you need to change on MQ. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WMBDEV1 |
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:12 am Post subject: Re: What to do on MQ side if the app uses WAS as JMS provide |
|
|
Sentinel
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 888 Location: UK
|
Sam Uppu wrote: |
Hi Guys,
On the WAS side, they have to map the MQ queues with their JMS queues in JNDI Bindings file.
|
you create the JMS objects (Qs and QCF) in WAS, i've not done this using a bindings file before though.
Although I think the prefered way of doing this now is to use the SIBus in WAS so you need to create a trans q and sender / receiver channels on MQ also. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
velocity |
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 30 Nov 2007 Posts: 126
|
Quote: |
Although I think the prefered way of doing this now is to use the SIBus in WAS so you need to create a trans q and sender / receiver channels on MQ also |
I was assuming that the appropriate MQ resources were already setup..These days most organizations use cluster channels instead of classic sender/receiver pair.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WMBDEV1 |
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sentinel
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 888 Location: UK
|
velocity wrote: |
These days most organizations use cluster channels instead of classic sender/receiver pair.... |
Not to the SIBus they dont (at least when I did it some time ago you couldnt)! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|