| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| MQSI 2.0.2 to WMQI 2.1 - Neon Component 5.2 to 5.6 |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| mehedi |
 Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2002 1:01 pm Post subject: MQSI 2.0.2 to WMQI 2.1 - Neon Component 5.2 to 5.6 |
 |
|
Centurion
Joined: 11 Nov 2001
Posts: 102
Location: PSTech
|
Hi All,
Briefly this is the process outlined for migrating/upgrading the NEON Formatter and Rules component version 5.2 to version 5.6.
(1) Export all formats from the current version.
(2) Install NEON components
(3) Create and configure the new NEON database using inst_db
(4) Create the ODBC connection,set NNSY* environment variables,update nnsyreg.dat file
(5) Import rules and format into the NEON 5.6 database.
Has anybody tried to migrate without step 1,3,5. ?
Here is the assumption -
The database structure is the same in 5.2 and 5.6 .
The only version specific information i noticed was in NN_PRODUCT_MSTR. This can be updated to the ver 5.6 info.
The advantages are
(1) The migration process is much more compact.
(2) Reuse existing database resources (Here is where the greatest savings are - not having to set up a new database and all the associated administrative activities)
(3) Elminates having to do the Export and Import process of formats.
Regards
Mehedi Hashir |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| wmqiguy |
| Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2002 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 09 Oct 2002
Posts: 145
Location: Florida
|
You will bump into problems. The NNSY tables probably have changed. (Columns added/deleted.) This means that when the NNSY part does any selects on its configuration, the potential is there for some uh-ohs.
I would take the extra 30 minutes and do all 5 steps and avoid the eventual headache. 
Todd |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mehedi |
| Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2002 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 11 Nov 2001
Posts: 102
Location: PSTech
|
Todd,
That my point i didn't see any other differences than the data in the
NN_PRODUCT_MSTR table. I could be wrong though.
Thanks
Mehedi |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jhalstead |
| Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2002 1:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 16 Aug 2001
Posts: 258
Location: London
|
It seems like a nice spot you've made. However if I were you I'd just follow the IBM/NNSY procedure, if thing go wrong you're compromising the level of support they'll give you.
Most likely the first suggestion they give will be to follow the procedure specified. As Todd says, it's not going to be much more effort to follow the defined process is it?
Jamie |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
