ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » COD's ending up in DLQ

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 COD's ending up in DLQ « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
blovell
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:05 am    Post subject: COD's ending up in DLQ Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 63
Location: Alpharetta, GA

I have been working with a particular client over the past few years. This particular clients requires my QMGR to transmit to them a COD when my Get application grabs files from my QLOCAL.

The client doesn't not use the USERID MQM in their MQMD to me. I had to manually add the user to my solaris box to and give that user authorization to my XMITQ back to the client.

Nothing has changed with my QMGR nor my users (/etc/passwd) file, however all files are now going to my DLQ with MQRC 2035 Authorization errors. I have captured one of their MQMD's and found they are still using the same USERID as before.

What could they have possibly done to cause this. I am trying to assist them, as it is rather important. We monitor our DLQ for other client issues.

HELPPP...
_________________
Bradley M. Lovell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
blovell
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 63
Location: Alpharetta, GA

I intended to post this to the general support forum. Can we please move this.
_________________
Bradley M. Lovell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Sam Uppu
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yatiri

Joined: 11 Nov 2008
Posts: 610

Quote:
The client doesn't not use the USERID MQM in their MQMD to me. I had to manually add the user to my solaris box to and give that user authorization to my XMITQ back to the client.


Is the userid in the MQMD of the messages on DLQ match the userid what you provided permissions for XMITQ?.

What do you see for the dspmqaut for the XMITQ and the destination queues?.

Are you using clustering or with the remote definitions?.

Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

Moved
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bbburson
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:46 am    Post subject: Re: COD's ending up in DLQ Reply with quote

Partisan

Joined: 06 Jan 2004
Posts: 378
Location: Nowhere near a queue manager

blovell wrote:
Nothing has changed with my QMGR nor my users (/etc/passwd) file, however all files are now going to my DLQ with MQRC 2035 Authorization errors. I have captured one of their MQMD's and found they are still using the same USERID as before.


What about /etc/group? Has the userid perhaps been removed from the group they were in? Remember, on UNIX systems MQ authorizations are granted to the group even if the -p flag is used in the setmqaut command entry.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blovell
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 63
Location: Alpharetta, GA

/etc/group has not changed either. I have checked the -p options and the -g options to the XMITQ and QMGR and found all permissions for that user set. However, I am suspecting the client is sending the USERID as UPPERCASE, wheras the user is lowercase.. I am not sure if that changed or not.. ONly suspecting at this point.


In an effort to correct the problem I tried to define a shell user as all UPPERCASE on solaris and it would not let me. (I was going to accomodate them if possible )
_________________
Bradley M. Lovell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
PeterPotkay
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 2:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722

Post the dead letter header from one of the messages in the DLQ. Use an amqsbcg(c) dump to get the actual data and post that.

Then do a dspmqaut for this user for both the QM and the XMITQ and post that output too.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » COD's ending up in DLQ
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.