| Author |
Message
|
| ramires |
 Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 4:08 am Post subject: amqmdain delay |
 |
|
Knight
Joined: 24 Jun 2001
Posts: 523
Location: Portugal - Lisboa
|
Hello,
in a windows box with 6.0.2.5, when I use amqmdain to start/stop a qmgr it takes more or less 2 minutes before something happens in the windows event viewer. With strmqm or endmqm its immediate. I know these are not the correct way, but what can be delaying the amqmdain? Some authority checking?
Thanks
joao |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| sumit |
| Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 5:49 am Post subject: Re: amqmdain delay |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 398
|
| ramires wrote: |
| when I use amqmdain to start/stop a qmgr it takes more or less 2 minutes before something happens in the windows event viewer. |
I tried that on my local machine with Windows server and MQ 6.0.2.4. It responded quickly.
| ramires wrote: |
| I know these are not the correct way |
Very true, one should not be using it. I hope you tried that just for testing.
| ramires wrote: |
| but what can be delaying the amqmdain? Some authority checking? |
amqmdain actually work on mq root process. I think depends on server load, the time varies.
_________________
Regards
Sumit |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ramires |
| Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Knight
Joined: 24 Jun 2001
Posts: 523
Location: Portugal - Lisboa
|
Thanks,
yes srtmqm / endmqm are for test purposes.
I just want to understand what is delaying it.
Regards
joao |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ramires |
| Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Knight
Joined: 24 Jun 2001
Posts: 523
Location: Portugal - Lisboa
|
I did some testing. In the box were amqmdain takes long start, I have 32 qmgrs ... don-t ask 
Deleting 20 of them, they were really used for test, seems to improve amqmdain performance.
javascript:emoticon(' ')
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 3:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| ramires wrote: |
| I did some testing. In the box were amqmdain takes long start, I have 32 qmgrs ... don-t ask |
32 queue managers? On a Windows box? All running? 
That's a record.
| ramires wrote: |
| Deleting 20 of them, they were really used for test, seems to improve amqmdain performance. |
I bet!
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 3:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
One thing I've noticed with Windows is that more queue managers can be started with strmqm than with amqmdain. I've had occasions when I couldn't start more than 9 queue managers using MQExplorer, but could start all 20 using strmqm and then start MQExplorer and have them all appear and working correctly - it is a test box by the way!
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ramires |
| Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Knight
Joined: 24 Jun 2001
Posts: 523
Location: Portugal - Lisboa
|
| Vitor wrote: |
32 queue managers? On a Windows box? All running?
That's a record.
|
no... they don't run at the same time 
Regards
joao |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sumit |
| Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 11:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 398
|
| exerk wrote: |
| One thing I've noticed with Windows is that more queue managers can be started with strmqm than with amqmdain. |
Can someone point the scenarios wherein we should use amqmdain ? I checked the mannuals and links but was not able to find a satisfactory reply.
_________________
Regards
Sumit |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| sumit wrote: |
| Can someone point the scenarios wherein we should use amqmdain ? I checked the mannuals and links but was not able to find a satisfactory reply. |
You should always use it. I only ever use strmqm in my sand-pit environment.
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| sumit wrote: |
| Can someone point the scenarios wherein we should use amqmdain ? |
IMHO it's a bad habit to get into. It's only available on Windows so any experience you gain it not portable.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
