Author |
Message
|
tanishka |
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:10 am Post subject: cluster queue curdepth going up |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 24 Nov 2008 Posts: 144
|
Cluster queue curdepth is going up?what is the problem is it mq issue or Application issue?Please help me? here are the queue attributes.
QUEUE(QC.QUEUE) TYPE(QLOCAL)
ACCTQ(QMGR) BOQNAME( )
BOTHRESH(0) CLUSNL( )
CLUSTER(XXXX) CLWLPRTY(0)
CLWLRANK(0) CLWLUSEQ(QMGR)
CRDATE(2008-11-05) CURDEPTH(22) DEFBIND(NOTFIXED)
DEFPRTY(0) DEFPSIST(YES)
DEFSOPT(SHARED) DEFTYPE(PREDEFINED)
DESCR(' ')
DISTL(NO) GET(ENABLED)
HARDENBO INITQ( )
IPPROCS(5) MAXDEPTH(64000)
MAXMSGL(4194304) MONQ(QMGR)
MSGDLVSQ(FIFO) NOTRIGGER
NPMCLASS(NORMAL) OPPROCS(0)
PROCESS( ) PUT(ENABLED)
QDEPTHHI(80) QDEPTHLO(20)
QDPHIEV(DISABLED) QDPLOEV(DISABLED)
QDPMAXEV(ENABLED) QSVCIEV(NONE)
QSVCINT(999999999) RETINTVL(999999999)
SCOPE(QMGR) SHARE
STATQ(QMGR) TRIGDATA( )
TRIGDPTH(1) TRIGMPRI(0)
TRIGTYPE(FIRST) USAGE(NORMAL) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:15 am Post subject: Re: cluster queue curdepth going up |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
tanishka wrote: |
Cluster queue curdepth is going up?what is the problem is it mq issue or Application issue?Please help me? here are the queue attributes.
|
Well the most plausible explaination is that WMQ is delivering messages but nothing's reading them. As WMQ typically doesn't read messages off a local queue I'd plump for application issue....
Especially as, according to that status there are 5 applications (or similar) reading from that queue. They're either not running, or not running fast enough! _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tanishka |
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 24 Nov 2008 Posts: 144
|
you mean this is the application issue not MQ issue.
in brief there are 5 input process are running and no output processes are running or not get the messages from the queue?am i right? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
tanishka wrote: |
you mean this is the application issue not MQ issue.
in brief there are 5 input process are running and no output processes are running or not get the messages from the queue?am i right? |
It's quite likely that the applications are not running, they've crashed and left their connections to the queue manager open. Or they're having an issue with WMQ rather than a straight application issue. It's impossible to tell from this. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tanishka |
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 24 Nov 2008 Posts: 144
|
can i ask them to restart their applications? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
tanishka wrote: |
can i ask them to restart their applications? |
How should I know?
I have no clue how these applications are written, what the implications of a stop/start are, what this would do to any business process, how your site deals with failures, anything. This is entirely down to how the applications are written and administered according to your site standards.
It's perfectly possible that restarting the applications would be ineffective - for example they could be hung up on a database problem.
You need to do some problem analysis here. Probably the easiest thing to do is to determine if there really are processes running against the queue or just dead handles.
Actually the easiest thing to do is tell the application people it's their problem until they can prove it's a WMQ one! Not always acceptable though...  _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tanishka |
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 24 Nov 2008 Posts: 144
|
Thanks so much for your quick replies.I approciate your help |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|