| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
| Gateway Queue Manager |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| ranganathan |
 Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 8:41 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Centurion
Joined: 03 Jul 2008
Posts: 104
|
I have two clusters
WINDOWS - which has 2 FR's of its own
LINUX - which has 2 FR's of its own
I wanted communication between the two clusters through a gateway queue manager but i donot want this new qmgr to be a FR. (which i can do by creating a Namelist and specify REPOSNL attribute)
As i didnot follow the naming convention TO.qmgrname.clustername.. i ran in to trouble while creating CLUSRCVR channels.. i reconfigured all as per the above advice and all worked well..
This scenario was described in clusters manual... I hope i made myself clear this time...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| exerk |
| Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| sami.stormrage wrote: |
| ...If you say a FR, it ought to be part of both the clusters.(atleast thats what the definition of FR says). |
There is absolutely no reason that an FR for one cluster 'ought to be' part of another cluster. Please post where you read '...at least that's what the definition of FR says...'
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20757
Location: LI,NY
|
You might want to use the CLUSNL attribute of cluster queues and clsrcvr chl. 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sami.stormrage |
| Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 186
Location: Bangalore/Singapore
|
| Quote: |
There is absolutely no reason that an FR for one cluster 'ought to be' part of another cluster. Please post where you read '...at least that's what the definition of FR says...' |
You are right (one FR for hub setup and one FRcould be for a Esb setup),but it is silly to have a seperate FR's for only two clusters.
_________________
*forgetting everything  * |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| sami.stormrage wrote: |
| You are right (one FR for hub setup and one FRcould be for a Esb setup),but it is silly to have a seperate FR's for only two clusters. |
There may have been valid business reasons for the original separation, requirements change.
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
