| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Setting up Pre-Production Environment |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| hkhan12 |
 Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 4:20 am Post subject: Setting up Pre-Production Environment |
 |
|
Voyager
Joined: 08 Aug 2002
Posts: 98
|
Hi All,
One of my task is to setup a Pre-Production MQ_Cluster environment which is a mimic to my existing Production MQ_Cluster environment per say C1.
Two Full Repositories in Production on AIX machines where Message Broker also running along with their corresponding DB2 Databases.
My question is, Ãf I setup a MQ_Cluster C2 in my Pre-Production environment, should I have identical Queue Manager, Message Broker, DB2 Broker database, and Application Database names? why and why not.
I guess, from Application point of view, it will be a lot easier if I can have identical names for all above mentioned components.
I will be highly appreciated for your input.
Regards, |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
Naming the queues the same ... by all means.
Channels should follow MQ naming conventions.
Naming the queue managers the same will be really dangerous. Should you inadvertently try a connection from a pre production qmgr to a production qmgr (I hope your firewall would prevent this) and succeed you can really mess up the production cluster as it has a visceral reation to having 2 qmgrs with the same name in the cluster...
Anyways MQ connection parameters should be different per environment. Use property files, JNDI setup etc... per environment.
Enjoy 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| hkhan12 |
| Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 08 Aug 2002
Posts: 98
|
Hi fjb_saper,
First of all, thanks a lot for responding to my post. Actually all these queue managers in Pre-Production would be in a different cluster per say C2 where as I have Production MQ Cluster as C1.
Do you think still it is a bad idea having identical queue manager names in two different MQ Clusters.
One more thing, Each machine containing only one Queue Manager.
Again thank you for your feedback.
Regards, |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sami.stormrage |
| Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 186
Location: Bangalore/Singapore
|
go by the convention T1(testing/SIT) Q1(preprod/QA/UAT) and P1(Prod)
And name the clusters accordingly..
_________________
*forgetting everything  * |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
