Author |
Message
|
MQ123 |
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 1:01 am Post subject: Top Ten reasons to bring MQ down |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 11
|
May be this is a little bit silly, but I want to ask you:
What are from your point of view and based upon your experiences the top ten reason which coud hurt MQ Series operations ?
Ok, I start with
1. Hardware failure and no HA
2. Running out of diskspace for log files
3. network problems (DNS Server problems)
4. .... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gaya3 |
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 1:45 am Post subject: Re: Top Ten reasons to bring MQ down |
|
|
 Jedi
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 2493 Location: Boston, US
|
1. Hardware failure and no HA
2. Running out of diskspace for log files
3. network problems (DNS Server problems)
4. Queue manager/Queue gets corrupted
Regards
Gayathri _________________ Regards
Gayathri
-----------------------------------------------
Do Something Before you Die |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MQ123 |
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 2:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 11
|
Thanks Gayathri - but can you classify this more in detail ?
What can cause a QM to come in a corrupted state ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JosephGramig |
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 5:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 1244 Location: Gold Coast of Florida, USA
|
On number 4, there can be disk failures of the integrity type that would corrupt files.
#5, Operators that delete files.
#6, WebSphere MQ Admins that think it is a good idea to have more then two QMGRs in a cluster be Full Repositories.
#7, WMQ Admins that foolishly issue cluster refresh commands on full repositories
#8, Managers that will not upgrade to Version 6
#9, Managers that will not apply maintenance
#10, Teams that do not appropriately plan and test their configurations |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RogerLacroix |
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 15 May 2001 Posts: 3264 Location: London, ON Canada
|
11. Applications that won't test against a QMgr restart. A properly coded / configured application should automatically reconnect to the QMgr in a reasonable amount of time.
Regards,
Roger Lacroix
Capitalware Inc. _________________ Capitalware: Transforming tomorrow into today.
Connected to MQ!
Twitter |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PeterPotkay |
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001 Posts: 7722
|
12. two queue managers in a cluster with the same name
13. two queue managers outside of a cluster talking to each other, both with the same name.
14. client apps that don't disconnect when they are done
15. not properly using DISCINT, HeartBeats, KeepAlive, AdoptNewMCA. _________________ Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bruce2359 |
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 9469 Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
16. No disaster recovery policy and process.
17. A disaster recovery policy and process that is not tested.
18. No security policy.
19. End-users (including programmers) in the MQM (or admin) groups. _________________ I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jcv |
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Chevalier
Joined: 07 May 2007 Posts: 411 Location: Zagreb
|
20. options which are provided, but not recommendable under any circumstances, be they just simply pointless or something worse, always make you wonder why are they made in the first place, or not removed afterwards, or turned into something useful |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MQ123 |
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 11
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|