ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Configuration manager damaged

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Configuration manager damaged « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
rmah
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:05 pm    Post subject: Configuration manager damaged Reply with quote

Centurion

Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 142

Hi all,

I'm getting this error I've never seen before when trying to communicate with the config mgr via command line:


-bash-3.00$ mqsilistaclentry mqconfig_01
Skipped Compiling {java/util/Hashtable}{rehash}
Skipped Compiling {java/util/Hashtable}{rehash}
BIP1047E: The operation could not be completed by the Configuration Manager.

The utility did not receive an expected message from the Configuration Manager within a reasonable amount of time. The cause is described as: 'hasBeenUpdatedByConfigManager timed out'

Ensure that the Configuration Manager is running and that the correct connection parameters have been supplied to the utility. Use the -w flag to increase the amount of time to wait for responses.
BIP8071I: Successful command completion.


Same errror when I increase the timeout period via -w flag. The Toolkit gives me this error:

BIP1162S: Unprocessable registration request received by the Configuration Manager.

A request was received by the Configuration Manager to register for updates to the resource */ConfigManagerProxy/ , but an exception was thrown while processing this request (com.ibm.broker.config.ConfigManagerLoggedException: handleSQLException).

Restart the connection to the Configuration Manager and retry the operation. If the exception still occurs, turn on Configuration Manager tracing to capture details of the request and contact your IBM support center.


Any thoughts?
THanks!!!!
_________________
MQ 6.0.2.3
Broker 6.0.0.7
for Linux
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

Restart the ConfigMgr...

It seems that "the internal ConfigMgr data repository" (we do not use the word 'derby') may be unavailable for some reason.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rmah
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Centurion

Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 142

jefflowrey wrote:
Restart the ConfigMgr...

It seems that "the internal ConfigMgr data repository" (we do not use the word 'derby') may be unavailable for some reason.


I've bounced the configuration manager many times with no avail.
_________________
MQ 6.0.2.3
Broker 6.0.0.7
for Linux
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

Is the ConfigMgr responding to a Toolkit?

Is the ConfigMgr throwing errors in the system log?
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rmah
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Centurion

Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 142

jefflowrey wrote:
Is the ConfigMgr responding to a Toolkit?

Is the ConfigMgr throwing errors in the system log?


Config manager not responding to connection request from Toolkit.

There are no errors in /var/log/messages. No new FDC's in /var/mqm/errors. AMQERR01.LOG shows no information to help either...
_________________
MQ 6.0.2.3
Broker 6.0.0.7
for Linux
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 3:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

So configmgr is running on unix, and is logging in /var/log/messages that a) it has successfully started, b) that it's ready to receive communications?

Is ConfigMgr using the same qmgr as Broker?

Has anything changed with filesystems or networks or etc. since the last time it worked?
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mqexplorer
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Posts: 17

jefflowrey wrote:
So configmgr is running on unix, and is logging in /var/log/messages that a) it has successfully started, b) that it's ready to receive communications?


Correct

Quote:

Is ConfigMgr using the same qmgr as Broker?


No, it has its own qmanager.

Quote:

Has anything changed with filesystems or networks or etc. since the last time it worked?


Dont believe so...one of the testers might have changed something but he claims not to have. I enabled the trace and have sent the trace files to ibm.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rmah
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Centurion

Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 142

jefflowrey wrote:
So configmgr is running on unix, and is logging in /var/log/messages that a) it has successfully started, b) that it's ready to receive communications?

Is ConfigMgr using the same qmgr as Broker?

Has anything changed with filesystems or networks or etc. since the last time it worked?


A tester started the config manager as the wrong user, thus causing the db.lck file to be owned by the wrong user.

We've changed the ownership and it works!
_________________
MQ 6.0.2.3
Broker 6.0.0.7
for Linux
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

rmah wrote:
A tester started the config manager as the wrong user, thus causing the db.lck file to be owned by the wrong user.


Bad tester. No cookie for them!

rmah wrote:
We've changed the ownership and it works!


_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Configuration manager damaged
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.