| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| WS with WBIMB Performance |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| hornbeam123 |
 Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:05 am Post subject: WS with WBIMB Performance |
 |
|
Centurion
Joined: 01 Nov 2003
Posts: 101
|
We have some flows acting as a WS facade others will call 'external' WebServices. They need to be designed and implemented for high throughput.
I'm looking for any performance hints and tips. I have studied the performance supportpaks but not found anything specific to WS with WBIMB. I did find some useful information about the workings of the HTTP Listener in the text of APAR IY66263.
From testing I see the messages put to the SYSTEM.BROKER.WS.INPUT and REPLY queues are non-persistent.
Let's say we have a pair of flows acting as a ws facade, one dealing with http inputs and mqoutput request and the other with mqinput reply/http replies.
Would it be performant to duplex the no. of instances of the flow as well as replicate the flow across many execution groups? Indeed does the additional instances property of the message flow apply to HTTP Input
nodes bearing in mind the brokers use of its internal WS queues ?
We have a pair of broker hosts sharing the workload with low utilisation and with two processors.
I think I know what the forum might say but this discussion would be useful for other users nonetheless.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
It should reasonably follow from the fact that the nodes internally use queues, that the scalability and performance characteristics of using additional instances and additional EGs are comparable for flows that start with MQInput nodes.
With the caveat that you may need to implement IE01.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
IMHO, and this is in no way an official one, you would be better served for performance with SOAP over JMS instead of SOAP over http.... 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| hornbeam123 |
| Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 3:14 am Post subject: WS with WBIMB Performance |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 01 Nov 2003
Posts: 101
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqmatt |
| Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 1213
Location: Hursley, UK
|
| You may also want to investigate the SOAP nodes in v6.1, as these work completely differently to the HTTP nodes (they don't use queues for a start, and requests to external web services can be made asynchronously). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
