| Author |
Message
|
| SAFraser |
 Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:29 pm Post subject: MS03 saveqmgr: OAM definitions error |
 |
|
Shaman
Joined: 22 Oct 2003
Posts: 742
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
|
Using both saveqmgr and saveqmgrc on our v6.0.2.2 queue managers with the "-z" option, I get stderr output:
| Quote: |
Writing OAM definitions to qmgr_name.AUT.
(oam.c) Unknown ObjectType 4 |
I do get an OAM definitions file as output, and it appears correct. (I did not confirm each of its ~300 lines, I just looked for glaring errors. But I can go through it one line at a time if it's deemed useful to do so.) I am using the most recent version of MS03 (v6.0.3).
Anyone have an experience like this?
Thanks,
Shirley
(I do believe our very own Grand Poobah is the keeper of this support pack now.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
Hi -
Yes, I am the current maintainer of MS03.
Your issue seems familiar, like I've seen mention of it before. But I haven't quite found it yet.
I'll get back to you in just a little bit.
In the meantime - what platform are you running it on? Windows?
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| SAFraser |
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Shaman
Joined: 22 Oct 2003
Posts: 742
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
|
I googled a bit, but couldn't find anything. Do you want me to look more closely at the output to see if there are any objects missing? I'd be glad to.
First I ran saveqmgrc from Windows connecting to Solaris queue managers (this is the preferred method for me so that the backup files are stored remotely from their source). Then I tried saveqmgr on the Solaris server itself. Same result.
[Editing to add] This is an example of the command line I'm using:
| Quote: |
| d:\QmgrBackups\saveqmgrc -a host.name(1414) -x SVRCONN.NAME -m QMGR.NAME -Rs -s -f -o -z |
No rush at all, just working on improving general maintenance here. Thanks a million.
Shirley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bbburson |
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 06 Jan 2004
Posts: 378
Location: Nowhere near a queue manager
|
Shirley,
If you'll run
| Code: |
| amqoamd -m QMGR.NAME >tmp.txt |
and then examine the file tmp.txt you'll find the following two lines:
| Code: |
ObjectType: storage_class
ObjectName: @class |
I can't hazard a guess why this shows up in the authorization info for some queue managers and not others, but the numeric MQOT_STORAGE_CLASS object type is 4 and I'll bet that's what causes the error message from oam.c.
I'll leave it to the Grand Poobah to do something about it.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| SAFraser |
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Shaman
Joined: 22 Oct 2003
Posts: 742
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
I'm digging through the output you sent me. It definitely seems to be a weird response from the command server, and not a bug per se in saveqmgr.
There's a bad line in your AUT file as a result, which is something that I'm going to try and resolve.
| Quote: |
| setmqaut -m MMMMMMMMM -n SYSTEM.DEFAULT.?????? -t ?4? -g xxxxx |
That won't actually function.
Also, if it's not any trouble, can you send me an amqoamd -s output?
Are you sure this qmgr is at 6.0.2.2?
It's reporting itself through PCF as being at 6.0.0.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| SAFraser |
| Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Shaman
Joined: 22 Oct 2003
Posts: 742
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
|
Here is the output from dspmqver:
| Quote: |
frasesh:/home/frasesh>dspmqver
Name: WebSphere MQ
Version: 6.0.2.2
CMVC level: p600-202-070801
BuildType: IKAP - (Production) |
I will send the output of amqoamd by email.
My continuing gratitude..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
I have seen some weird output on windows though and especially after virtualization.
Reason the hidden id of user and group possibly no longer matching what it was defined under as the whole image was just loaded....
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
| fjb_saper wrote: |
| I have seen some weird output on windows though and especially after virtualization. |
This is an undocumented response from the command server, running on Solaris.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| wschutz |
| Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 02 Jun 2005
Posts: 3316
Location: IBM (retired)
|
so what does: amqoamd -s produce for that object?
_________________
-wayne |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
| wschutz wrote: |
| so what does: amqoamd -s produce for that object? |
There doesn't appear to be a corresponding entry. Will email you the output file.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
