| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Unpredictable response from the Websphere Server... |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| kshipra.kalbandhe |
 Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:14 pm Post subject: Unpredictable response from the Websphere Server... |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 4
Location: Nagpur
|
Hi,
I am a newbie in MQ Client Development.
I am facing the following problem.
Using Websphere MQ 6.0 as the Server one of the machines
I am using Websphere MQ Client on another machine.
Actually I am using the "MQSeries Automation Classes for ActiveX" which is being accessed by my custom Application for communication with the MQ Server.
The PROBLEM:
the following call returns the valid manager ptr
MQAX200::IMQSession200Ptr -> AccessQueueManager
BUT SOMETIME IT FAILS WITHOUT CHANGE IN ANYTHING, with the
ReasonName "MQRC_Q_MGR_NAME_ERROR"
So, I am unable to understand, from where exactly the problem is arising, sometimes it runs fine, immediately after running fine it gives this error.
Thanks in advance.
regards,
kshipra
[/b] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
The MQ ActiveX classes are deprecated.
Use .NET instead.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kshipra.kalbandhe |
| Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 3:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 4
Location: Nagpur
|
Actually we got a legacy project already implemented using MQAX, hence we have to make use of it.....
Is some help available for it on the net....specifically for the Problem stated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| kshipra.kalbandhe wrote: |
| Is some help available for it on the net....specifically for the Problem stated. |
Interestingly, I used to find this with the ActiveX controls. Used to drive me wild so I built a wrapper round the C API and included that.
But as jefflowrey says, you shouldn't be using ActiveX. Even for legacy. Now is the time to freshen your project
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
