| Author |
Message
|
| AviD |
 Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 9:10 am Post subject: SIBus on WAS 6.1 and MQ 6.0 Explorer |
 |
|
Acolyte
Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 62
|
| Is there a way to connect to an SIBus in WAS 6.1 with MQ 6.0 Explorer such that you can view and/or manage the SIBus qmgr? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Michael Dag |
| Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 13 Jun 2002
Posts: 2607
Location: The Netherlands (Amsterdam)
|
AFAIK the SIBUS is not MQ, so why would you be able to connect to it using the MQ Explorer?
_________________
Michael
MQSystems Facebook page |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| AviD |
| Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 62
|
FMU, the SIBus is seen as just another MQ qmgr from the Websphere MQ perspective via the MQ Link and Foreign Bus setup in SIBus. Although the implementation differs, I believe the end goal was to achieve a transparent layer of abstraction between the two messaging engines to allow for communication between the two without either implementation being important. (i.e. Websphere MQ sees SIBus as just another Websphere MQ instance, and vice versa).
I'd imagine if you can connect to it through sender/receiver channels, you can connect to it through a svrconn channel to view the objects through that MQ Link. Of course, I am just speculating, which is why I'm asking 
In our company we have two different groups that manage the MQ infrastructure and the WAS infrastructure, so we are looking for a consolidated MQ infrastructure management perspective in respect to tooling and were hoping we could extend off the Websphere MQ Explorer to view the SIBus components (MQ related objects, albeit they are different due to the implementation, but again we are hoping the queue destinations could be viewed as MQ objects) as opposed to using the WAS Admin Console. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
I'm quite sure that SIBus doesn't have any notion of SVRCONN channels.
I'm quite sure that SIBus doesn't have any notion of PCF Messages, or the command server to process those messages.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| AviD wrote: |
| FMU, the SIBus is seen as just another MQ qmgr from the Websphere MQ perspective via the MQ Link and Foreign Bus setup in SIBus. |
Nope, I don't think that's the case.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ashu |
| Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 11 Nov 2006
Posts: 132
|
I think the MQ Explorer is just a frontend provided for the MQ runtime on the system.
Can you use the Admin Console of one AppSrvr to view the applications deployed on another AppSrvr (of same or different vendor types)?
This is what I feel....ofcourse..  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| AviD |
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 62
|
| jefflowrey wrote: |
I'm quite sure that SIBus doesn't have any notion of SVRCONN channels.
I'm quite sure that SIBus doesn't have any notion of PCF Messages, or the command server to process those messages. |
Jeff, good/obvious points...oh well  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
