Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:53 am Post subject: GatewayQueueManager or Broker QueueManager
Centurion
Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 124
Hi
We have Gateway and Broker Queue Managers in cluster and Gateway doesn't have any objects and those Gateways are with the same name on different server and highly available for the application with same dns name.Applications connect to Gateway queue manager and put the messages to the Cluster alias queues pointing to the Broker QueueManager
We are planning to use client channel table and remove the Gateway queue managers and dns name too.
Quote:
Some one suggested me not to remove Gateways as Applications are connecting to it and if there is any application issues some times it may possible to crash the Gateway QueueManager and If it is Broker Queue Manager it will so bad we need to take care of the Broker too as Broker Queue Manager is down. And if it is Gateway it is very easy to manage as it doesn't have anyobjects on it
Please advice that I can keep the Gateway QueueManager or can I remove them and allow applications to connect to the Broker QueueManager.
In the case of client applications, remember that the server side performs most of the processing load, so it's better to have a separate qmgr than to impose that load on the broker machine. _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum