| Author |
Message
|
| Gaya3 |
 Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:51 am Post subject: AMQ6118: An internal WebSphere MQ error has occurred (893) |
 |
|
Jedi
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 2493
Location: Boston, US
|
Hi All
I tried to migrate MQ V5.3 to MQ V6.0, but after migration, i couldn't able to start the queue manager at any way.
its prompting the below error
AMQ6118: An internal WebSphere MQ error has occurred (893)
Os - HP-UX,
I thought of going ahead with MQ V6 , Refresh Pack 2
The FDC's generated were
Probe ID: HL000001
Minor Errorcode :- hrcE_MQLO_SEMA
Probe Id :- AL061012
Minor Errorcode :- hrcE_MQLO_UNEXPECTED_OS_ERROR.
It resembles like an authorization issue.
Where i might have gone wrong, is it while installing the software.
I searched and found out the below sites
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IY33837
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21176435
even i searched this forum but most of them are for MQ V5.3
Please give you valueable inputs regarding this
Thanks and Regards
Gayathri
_________________
Regards
Gayathri
-----------------------------------------------
Do Something Before you Die |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:04 am Post subject: Re: AMQ6118: An internal WebSphere MQ error has occurred (89 |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| Gaya3 wrote: |
| Minor Errorcode :- hrcE_MQLO_SEMA |
You don't say what platform you're on, but if you're on a flavour of Unix I'd check:
a) that there are no held semaphores from a previous 5.3 process
b) that your kernel parameters are valid for a 6.0 installation
c) that you don't have a raft of queue managers soaking up resources and this last one doesn't start (though you imply this is the only one you're starting)
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Gaya3 |
| Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 2493
Location: Boston, US
|
Hi Vitor
I have mentioned it
OS- HP-UX (11.11)
Will you please clear me the last statement (c)
Thanks and Regards
Gayathri
_________________
Regards
Gayathri
-----------------------------------------------
Do Something Before you Die |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| Gaya3 wrote: |
| I have mentioned it |
So you did .... 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Gaya3 |
| Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 2493
Location: Boston, US
|
Hi Vitor
Will you please clear me the last statement (c) that you quoted
But i dont have any issues in creating any new queue managers
Thanks and Regards
Gayathri
_________________
Regards
Gayathri
-----------------------------------------------
Do Something Before you Die |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
One possible cause of the lack of semaphore resource which I'm theorising could be your problem is that other queue managers are using up all the available resource; i.e. you can start 100 queue managers but you can't start the 101st.
I had discounted this as the implication of your post is that you can't start any queue managers post-upgrade, but included the theory for completeness.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| Gaya3 wrote: |
| But i dont have any issues in creating any new queue managers |
Until you start them, they don't use resource (except disc).
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Gaya3 |
| Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 2493
Location: Boston, US
|
Hi Vitor
The most strange thing is we do have only one queue manager in that node.
as i said, i created and started one queue manager in that node.
and its running fine in that. (note: i didn't create any queues under this)
Just created and started thats all.
so as you said, let me check the semaphores and kernel parameters
Thanks and Regards
gayathri
_________________
Regards
Gayathri
-----------------------------------------------
Do Something Before you Die |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
Slightly confused (it's been that sort of a day):
| Gaya3 wrote: |
| after migration, i couldn't able to start the queue manager at any way |
| Gaya3 wrote: |
i created and started one queue manager in that node.
and its running fine in that. |
How do you reconcile these 2 statements? Or is it just me?
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Gaya3 |
| Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 2493
Location: Boston, US
|
Sorry for confusing you
I created a new qmgr and started, thats what i meant
but i am not able to start the migrated queue manager that is already existing
Thanks and Regards
Gayathri
_________________
Regards
Gayathri
-----------------------------------------------
Do Something Before you Die |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| Gaya3 wrote: |
| Sorry for confusing you |
You're not the first today; I've done it myself on a couple of occasions!
So there's no issue with the instalation per se as you can create and start queue managers? The issue is entirely with the migrated one?
Sounds a bit like it didn't close down cleanly & something got left looking for a semaphore value. I'd be well inclined to be considering a PMR at this point. There's no good reason why a migrated queue manager shouldn't work.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
