| Author |
Message
|
| kriersd |
 Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2002 8:03 pm Post subject: Package FMCDBWCS has isolation level UR, should have CS |
 |
|
Master
Joined: 22 Jul 2002
Posts: 209
Location: IA, USA
|
Hello
I have an issue.. Any help or advice would be nice.
We upgraded to SP 2 for version 3322. When I look at the fmczchk output
I see this:
FMC34537E: Package FMCDBWCS has isolation level UR, should have CS.
I am not a UNIX guru yet so this may be a result of my doing. Did something happen when I installed the Service Pack.
HELP Please
Dave
_________________
Dave Krier
IBM WebSphere MQ Workflow V3.4 Solution Designer |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jmac |
| Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2002 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
Dave:
Same exact error on an Win2K System
FMC34537E: Package FMCDBWCS has isolation level UR, should have CS.
Have you heard anything from IBM on this?
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ratan |
| Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2002 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 1245
|
I too got the exact same error. I dont understand the effect of that on the system. The system seems to run well. Please let me know if you get a fix.
-Laze. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jmac |
| Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2002 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
Received the following from Developer:
------------
John,
we changed the isolation level of this package and obviously the checker was not adopted.
Please ignore this error message.
Volker Hoss
MQSeries Workflow Development
--------------
It seems that we can safely ignore this message
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kriersd |
| Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2002 6:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 22 Jul 2002
Posts: 209
Location: IA, USA
|
Great News.
I will ignore this error. :)
_________________
Dave Krier
IBM WebSphere MQ Workflow V3.4 Solution Designer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ratan |
| Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2002 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 1245
|
Yeah, This is what I got back from IBM
Our C/T is aware of this error - here is what they have to say:
that means the bind went ok, but the checker gives kind of wrong
information.
They are currenlty looking into the problem - should not affect the way the
product performs.
---------------------------------------
-Laze |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
