Author |
Message
|
Vitor |
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
LemonJelly wrote: |
if the q managers are on seperate servers????
I presume it gets routed to ip address, on the listening port.... picked up by the specified q manager? |
Again this is WMQ 101. Simple, simple stuff. I'm not going to retype the documentation, annotating the parts about intercommunication, when it's all perfectly clearly laid out.
And I've already said that messages are not routed to an IP address but to a queue manager. It's additionally pointless to repeat myself.
RTFM. If you have a specific question about a specific situation where things are not happening as you expect (like a message going to the DLQ) then post it. If it's a more general question like "how do messages find their way" this forum is not the place.
Go though the Intercommunication manual. Get to grips with the relationship between the various MQ objects. If you don't know what will happen in a given situation try it. Set up queue managers on 2 different servers and pass messages between them.
Experiment. Make mistakes. Learn. It's worth it in the long run. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LemonJelly |
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 24 Nov 2006 Posts: 23
|
Vitor wrote: |
LemonJelly wrote: |
if the q managers are on seperate servers????
I presume it gets routed to ip address, on the listening port.... picked up by the specified q manager? |
Again this is WMQ 101. Simple, simple stuff. I'm not going to retype the documentation, annotating the parts about intercommunication, when it's all perfectly clearly laid out.
And I've already said that messages are not routed to an IP address but to a queue manager. It's additionally pointless to repeat myself.
RTFM. If you have a specific question about a specific situation where things are not happening as you expect (like a message going to the DLQ) then post it. If it's a more general question like "how do messages find their way" this forum is not the place.
Go though the Intercommunication manual. Get to grips with the relationship between the various MQ objects. If you don't know what will happen in a given situation try it. Set up queue managers on 2 different servers and pass messages between them.
Experiment. Make mistakes. Learn. It's worth it in the long run. |
Point taken....
thanks again for input and help. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
LemonJelly wrote: |
thanks again for input and help. |
You're quite welcome. I look forward to assisting in future should an experiement fail for inexplicable reasons.
Allow me to point you to a useful thread which I offer in a genuine spirit of assistance:
http://www.mqseries.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=22295
It's solid advice which I use myself from a wiser man than me.
Happy Experimenting!  _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LemonJelly |
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 24 Nov 2006 Posts: 23
|
Vitor wrote: |
LemonJelly wrote: |
thanks again for input and help. |
You're quite welcome. I look forward to assisting in future should an experiement fail for inexplicable reasons.
Allow me to point you to a useful thread which I offer in a genuine spirit of assistance:
http://www.mqseries.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=22295
It's solid advice which I use myself from a wiser man than me.
Happy Experimenting!  |
Guilty of almost every point on that article.
Apologies and hopefully Im on the recovery path. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
LemonJelly wrote: |
hopefully Im on the recovery path. |
You see? Learning already. Expert in no time.
Nil desperandum. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LemonJelly |
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 24 Nov 2006 Posts: 23
|
Vitor wrote: |
LemonJelly wrote: |
hopefully Im on the recovery path. |
You see? Learning already. Expert in no time.
Nil desperandum. |
Problem now solved.
I think it was the case of my queuemanagers.
I deleted and started from scratch using all upper case and bada bing..... it works......
So whats the lesson learnt here.....
**Watch your case's when creating queues / queue managers / Channels / Transmission Queues etc.** |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
More formally expressed within the documentation as:
"All MQ objects are case sensitive"
but yes, that sounds like it. Edit the subject to start with "[solved]" and feel justifyably proud.
As a tip for future readers, it's normal for all MQ objects to be defined in upper case for exactly this reason. Especially where there's a mainframe in the mix; typing lower case in ISPF is a pain! _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LemonJelly |
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 24 Nov 2006 Posts: 23
|
Vitor wrote: |
More formally expressed within the documentation as:
"All MQ objects are case sensitive"
but yes, that sounds like it. Edit the subject to start with "[solved]" and feel justifyably proud.
As a tip for future readers, it's normal for all MQ objects to be defined in upper case for exactly this reason. Especially where there's a mainframe in the mix; typing lower case in ISPF is a pain! |
Ok I am going to look like a right dumb ass here but I dont think I can edit Thread subjects.
Is this a permission thing or am I complete rain man? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jefflowrey |
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
|
Edit the first message, change the subject. _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LemonJelly |
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 3:34 am Post subject: [SOLVED] Messages going straigth to dead letter queue |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 24 Nov 2006 Posts: 23
|
[SOLVED] Messages going straigth to dead letter queue |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bbburson |
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Posts: 378 Location: Nowhere near a queue manager
|
jefflowrey wrote: |
Edit the first message, change the subject. |
It won't work to add a new reply with the changed subject. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sidharth_bora |
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Voyager
Joined: 24 Nov 2005 Posts: 87
|
Hi,
I am getting mqrc 2080 .. how to resolve it and how to confirm its an application problem |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sidharth_bora |
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:34 am Post subject: mqrc 2080 |
|
|
 Voyager
Joined: 24 Nov 2005 Posts: 87
|
Hi,
for mqrc 2080 , messages are landing in local DQL i.e location 1 .. please can some body help
regards
Sid |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
sidharth_bora wrote: |
Hi,
I am getting mqrc 2080 .. how to resolve it and how to confirm its an application problem |
1. This has nothing to do with the thread you've posted it on.
2. Look up the error code in the documentation. The description of the code makes it clear that it's an application error and how to fix it.
Or even a quick glance at the result of an mqrc would give you a fairly big hint!  _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
But as it's nearly Xmas:
Code: |
2080 0x00000820 MQRC_TRUNCATED_MSG_FAILED |
So, what could possibly be truncating the message????  _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|