| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Using Coordinator of Role Programmatically |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| Bobbo |
 Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2002 11:05 am Post subject: Using Coordinator of Role Programmatically |
 |
|
Acolyte
Joined: 17 Jun 2002
Posts: 50
Location: Buffalo, New York
|
How does one make programmatic use of the "Coordinator of Role" property? Does this user have certain rights within that role or does this property only exist for organizing your staff (i.e., simply knowing who the coordinator of a role is)?
I do know that you can obtain the list of Roles a particular person can coordinate (NamesOfRolesToCoordinate), but what does this give me?
Thanks,
Bob |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jmac |
| Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2002 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
The only benefit I've seen to Coordinator of Role is for Staffing purposes. I.E. you can assign an activity to the Coordinator of a particular role (BTW, this bypasses the Staff Resolution Algorithms, so it is quite efficient).
I would be much more likely to use this if I could say I want the coordinator to automatically have access to the Workitems of all of the members of a role.
I don't find the feature to be all that useful... hope this helps
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Bobbo |
| Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2002 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 17 Jun 2002
Posts: 50
Location: Buffalo, New York
|
I agree. If I could assign a Coordinator to a Role and have that person automatically have access to the worklists of the Role members, the feature would be much more useful.
As an aside, it would also be useful to be able to get at the Role Description programmatically. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jmac |
| Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2002 4:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
If you are a large MQWF Customer, please make this requirement known to IBM. I have been asking for Staff APIs since the FlowMark days, and they always seem to say yeah that's a great idea, someday it will happen. If you find this really limiting make it known to IBM.
You might also ask for some "Exit Points" in the Staff Resolution alogrithms, (another thing that would help in your situation I believe and that I have been asking IBM about for many years) 
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
