| Author |
Message
|
| MQALearner |
 Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:12 pm Post subject: No of Queues and Channels per QMGR |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Posts: 9
|
Hi
Is there any limit that we have to limit our # of Queues and channel in each QMGR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
No.
But yes.
There is no fixed number.
But your machine has limits, particularly in terms of network resources for channels.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| tinye |
| Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 02 Aug 2005
Posts: 17
Location: OHIO
|
I have it in my head that fewer QMs is better from a resource perspective....but would just like to clarify because I'm at a decision point.
For instance....say I needed to define 30 queues on one server. If I had a choice, it would be better for me to define all 30 queues in one QM; rather than 10 queues in 3 QMs.
Is this accurate logic, or it really would not matter either way? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| wschutz |
| Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 02 Jun 2005
Posts: 3316
Location: IBM (retired)
|
I don't think there is any question at all: 30 queues in one qmgr is better that 10 queues each in 3 qmgrs.
Extra qmgrs means more connections, additional processes, more things to break....
The only reson IMHO for multiple qmgrs on a single box is for isolation purposes.
_________________
-wayne |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bbburson |
| Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 06 Jan 2004
Posts: 378
Location: Nowhere near a queue manager
|
| wschutz wrote: |
| The only reson IMHO for multiple qmgrs on a single box is for isolation purposes. |
Or active/active high availability where >1 queue managers may end up on the same machine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
