| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Problem with MQGet node and V 5.0 broker |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| Cliff |
 Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 10:10 am Post subject: Problem with MQGet node and V 5.0 broker |
 |
|
Centurion
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 145
Location: Wiltshire
|
Folks, I am preparing an environment (all Win XP) to do some off-site development work for a client who runs Toolkit V 5.1 CSD3 on Windows and Broker 5.0 CSD4 on AIX.
They have a multi-threaded version of the MQGet node called MQGetXX with various AIX-specific bits, and never implemented this on aWindows broker. This node is buried in numerous widely used subflows that I need to use unchanged, so my thinking was to amend MQGet with a bit of judicious renaming so I had something that would work on Windows that would be OK for unit testing - I don't need multi-threading for this. Integration testing will be on AIX.
So, I changed the code, go a clean compile and link using Visual Studio, copied the MQGetXX.lil to the <InstallPath>/bin and restarted the broker. I can build the bar file with no problems but when I deploy I get a message: BIP2241E: LIL not found for flow node type 'MQGetXXNode' in mesage flow 'MyFlow'.
This looks like the same problem from this thread: http://www.mqseries.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=15930&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30
Can anyone help here? I've tried everything I know (lots more than mentioned above) and now I'm stuck. All suggestions gratefully received.
Cheers -
Cliff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| wschutz |
| Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 02 Jun 2005
Posts: 3316
Location: IBM (retired)
|
I'd start by bringing my service level up-to-date ..... you're four fp's behind on windows.....
_________________
-wayne |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Cliff |
| Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 145
Location: Wiltshire
|
Well, Wayne, I don't think it's my place to insist my client upgrades! I'm simply running the same level of code as them, since that's what I'll have to implement on.
I think the answer is probably the result of PMR 66639,422, from the thread I mentioned. If it's possible to obtain a cpoy of the code, unwarranted is just fine, I'd be happy. Can anyone oblige?
Cliff |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
