ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General Discussion » XMS C/C++: Performance versus plain JMS

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 XMS C/C++: Performance versus plain JMS « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
PeterPotkay
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 11:40 am    Post subject: XMS C/C++: Performance versus plain JMS Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722

Saket,
How does XMS compare to JMS in terms of performance?
http://www.mqseries.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=27397
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
saketr
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apprentice

Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 41

Peter,

As you are well aware, System performance and scalability are tricky subjects. We haven't collected formal performance numbers that could be publicly posted.

There are many dimensions in the comparison you have suggested - runtime technology vs native execution, choice of runtime technology, JIT/GC options, resource utilization vs t/put (resource = cpu | memory | network | disk footprint), message type, message size, connection mode, think time, messaging scenario, choice of hardware, library versions, features being benchmarked (selection | sync/async | persistence | admin objects etc.) etc. I would be very interested to hear about your observations for any datapoints chosen from above dimensions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterPotkay
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722

Well, I think when asking about comparisions in performance, I assume all other variables are the same as much as possible.

That's always a knock on JMS, on how slow it is. XMS being C based should be a lot faster, no?
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
saketr
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apprentice

Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 41

That's a fair assumption, but perhaps not always true. You gotta try it out and tell me what you think!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General Discussion » XMS C/C++: Performance versus plain JMS
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.