| Author |
Message
|
| PAQUOT |
 Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 7:03 am Post subject: websphere 5.3 CS7 performance counter not available in W2K3 |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 3
Location: Belgium
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
Did you check with perfmon ?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PAQUOT |
| Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 3
Location: Belgium
|
What do you mean by "did you check perfmon ?"
I found in perfmon that I have no performance counter related to websphere MQ.
(to give uou some more information about "my" system
on this system
I installed biztalk 2004
adapter MQSeries 2.0
adapter MSMQ)
How do I get the performance counter ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
Do you have a local MQ QMGR on your system or is it remote ?
I hope that M$ perfected the Biztalk adapter for MQ. I looked at it a few years back and found it to be slow... ( a JMS program from WMQ to MSMQ would probably have been faster)....
Enjoy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Michael Dag |
| Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 13 Jun 2002
Posts: 2607
Location: The Netherlands (Amsterdam)
|
| fjb_saper wrote: |
| (a JMS program from WMQ to MSMQ would probably have been faster).... |
 Since when does MSMQ support JMS?
or did I miss something since this was written?
_________________
Michael
MQSystems Facebook page |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| Michael Dag wrote: |
| fjb_saper wrote: |
| (a JMS program from WMQ to MSMQ would probably have been faster).... |
Since when does MSMQ support JMS?
or did I miss something since this was written? |
Hmmm did it say sponsored by IBM ? If M$ really wants to play in the SMB tier and use Biztalk as the SMB Broker it will have to adapt and allow JMS interfaces or else it may be cutting itself off some juicy marketshare...
Well may be there is no JMS provider yet for MSMQ... https://msmqtojavaxa.projects.dev2dev.bea.com/
Surely it should not be too difficult for the guys at Redmond to write one!
Or do they plan on free aspx ?
In any case the WMQ provider is probably a little bit faster passing the messages to MSMQ than the adapter (I tested 3 years ago...) if they are of considerable size (over 300 KB) and need some time parsing...
And you would be able to write the M$ part in native for default of a M$ JMS provider...
In all cases, JMS is a moot point here since MQ V5.3 CSD05 and the .NET kit. Sorry I was looking back on older stuff.
My motto: if you have to use those 2 technologies and the provided bridges / adapters are not fast enough -- see if you can write one that's faster...(and maybe with less functionality like leave any parsing out of the adapter...)
Sorry
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PAQUOT |
| Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 3
Location: Belgium
|
Hi,
Yes i have local queue manager
Yes, MQseries works.
I don't care about JMS header, I don't care about performance or serialization or ...
I would like to re focus on the thread: " I have no perf counter in perfmon"
Can somebody help me on this ?
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| If you have a local qmgr on the machine and installed WMQ correctly you should see in perfmon some counters. Can't tell you exactly what they are under (IBM MQ Series or Websphere MQ or ....) but there should be some counters there. However I would really go for some MQ monitoring solution either free or for $ (QPasa..., Omegamon....) etc... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
