| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Quiescing Qmanagers |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| dlamont |
 Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 8:12 am Post subject: Quiescing Qmanagers |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 15 Sep 2005
Posts: 7
Location: St. Charles, MO
|
Hi Everyone,
Just a general question about endmqm. This weekend, we are migrating all our MQ processes to a new server. I want to quiesce all the queue managers on the old machine, let them finish what they are doing, yet accept no new input. I do not want to have any rolled-back messages that I have to copy over to the new machine, to load into the queues there.
Will an endmqm -c accomplish this?
Thanks everyone.
_________________
- Dave Lamont |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722
|
Depending on how the apps connected to MQ are written, most likely because of the way the apps are written, you will wait forever.
Its up to the apps to decided that they want to MQCLOSE their qs and MQDISC. If they choose not to, then the QM will never end with -c.
-Peter
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| csmith28 |
| Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 15 Jul 2003
Posts: 1196
Location: Arizona
|
Alternatively you could have the applications stopped before you issue the endmqm command.
_________________
Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| javagate |
| Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 15 Nov 2004
Posts: 159
|
On z/OS I continue to have problems with impatient operators who force, cancel and even IPL the box with them running because they don't want to wait for an orderly shutdown. I am lucky I have not had any (knock on wood) restart problems with rba errors...
_________________
WebSphere Application Server 7.0 z/OS &
MQ 6.0. I work with WebSphere in the real world not in some IBM lab. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kevinf2349 |
| Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 1311
Location: USA
|
...all of which leaves me wondering why 'FAIL-IF-QUIESCING' isn't a default? Or at least a site tailorable option to make it the default.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
