|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
 |
|
Queue Connection Factory VS Connection Factory |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
Author |
Message
|
qcf |
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 11:23 pm Post subject: Queue Connection Factory VS Connection Factory |
|
|
 Novice
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 10 Location: Australia
|
What is the difference between Connection Factory (CF) and Queue Connection Factory (QCF) in JMS?
When to use which?
When I define JNDI name for WMQ objects for Point-to-Point connection should I just define QCF and no need to define the CF? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fschofer |
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Knight
Joined: 02 Jul 2001 Posts: 524 Location: Mainz, Germany
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JLRowe |
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 3:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Yatiri
Joined: 25 May 2002 Posts: 664 Location: South East London
|
This was a change in JMS 1.1, it's just so that you can use a CF instead of a QCF or TCF. It allows your code to work with either topics or queues, before this you had to code to either a queue or a topic. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bower5932 |
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Aug 2001 Posts: 3023 Location: Dallas, TX, USA
|
I believe the change also allows you to do publish/subscribe and point-to-point in the same unit of work. Before, they would be separate because of where you had access to objects. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|