Author |
Message
|
sairam |
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2005 7:41 am Post subject: AMQ6090 messages for MQ5.3 on Linux |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 07 Mar 2005 Posts: 120
|
Hi,
I get the AMQ6090 error messages even when i use the "runmqsc" command. There are some qmgrs defined long back and the default qmgr showing in the mqs.ini file is not visible in the "/opt/mqm/qmgrs" directory. So i am not able to start the default qmgr. Should i alter the mqs.ini default queue manager to that which really exists?/
I get an error when doing this, i am not the root user and i belong to the mqm group.Any tips please why this is happening. Appreciated.
crtmqm -u SYSTEM.DEAD.LETTER.QUEUE SAMPLE
AMQ6090: WebSphere MQ was unable to display an error message 20006220.
Pls advise.
sk. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
teal |
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2005 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Acolyte
Joined: 15 Dec 2004 Posts: 66
|
Quote: |
Set environment variable
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19
WebSphere MQ requires that this environment variable is exported
from any shell where installation is performed, WebSphere MQ control
commands are issued or WebSphere MQ applications are executed.
|
comment above edited by "young bill"
Last edited by teal on Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:25 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kman |
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2005 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 309 Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
I am not sure why 'young Bill' put a quote on Linux RHEL3 in this thread.... what's that suppose to mean?
Anyway, what could have happen with the mq setup? You have mqs.ini that does not correlate with your actual setup. If the mqs.ini is showing non-existence queue manager, this must be a wrong file, or could have been copied from other machine. You might want to remove the DefaultQueueManager stanza from the mqs.ini file.
Something is not right in your system if the mqs.ini does not reflect the correct setup. Someone deleted the default queue manager from the system, and then recover the mqs.ini from the backup....  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fjb_saper |
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 5:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 20756 Location: LI,NY
|
Or just plain messed with the file system without using the MQ programs |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
teal |
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Acolyte
Joined: 15 Dec 2004 Posts: 66
|
if you READ it, you would see it is simply stating to add
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19 to resolve the error message.
cheers!
-young Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jefflowrey |
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
|
teal wrote: |
the error message |
There were two errors in the original question.
 _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kman |
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 5:36 pm Post subject: Re: AMQ6090 messages for MQ5.3 on Linux |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 309 Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
sksairam wrote: |
.. There are some qmgrs defined long back...
|
Does it has anything to do with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL? I would imagine if that's the case, the variable has been setup in the env. /profile.
But then again he's not using root. hmmmmm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vennela |
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002 Posts: 4055 Location: Hyderabad, India
|
Quote: |
Does it has anything to do with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL? I would imagine if that's the case, the variable has been setup in the env. /profile. |
It might also be that the variable has been setup in command line mode and created the QMGRs and worked their way.
Anyway setting that variable should solve the problem. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kman |
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 309 Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
Yes.. I can understand the kernel issue. And the problem with crtmqm.
How does it relate to the problem with mqs.ini? He has a problem with mqs.ini having a default queue manager that is not in the system?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Anirud |
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Master
Joined: 12 Feb 2004 Posts: 285 Location: Vermont
|
I think young Bill's reply was based on
error message. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|