ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum IndexWorkflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographersharing workflow configurations

Post new topicReply to topic
sharing workflow configurations View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
naresh
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 9:01 am Post subject: sharing workflow configurations Reply with quote

Newbie

Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 3

We plan on sharing an existing workflow environment between multiple applications. Each application has a different process template using programs such as FMCNSHOW,FMCINTERNALNOOP etc. Each template uses a different data container.

Does anyone know of any issues/pitfalls that we need to look out for such as overwriting object definitions?”

Also are there concerns with volumes of messages going across the same set of queues? Combined total of 11000 process instances being created per day; possibly cleaned up once a week.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ratan
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 9:56 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 1245

Your scenario doesnot really require multiple Workflow Environments. You can just add multiple WF Systems to the same group to gain performance.
_________________
-Ratan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
naresh
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:24 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Newbie

Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 3

yes, we plan on using a single environement which will be shared for multiple WF Systems, i was just wondering whether there were any conflict issues associated with programs/data structures that have the same name but different definitions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jmac
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 11:14 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC

naresh wrote:
i was just wondering whether there were any conflict issues associated with programs/data structures that have the same name but different definitions.


Well there are only 2 possible conflicts I can see, neither of which should cause a problem

FMCINTERNALNOOP, but the definition of this Program Object should be the same on all systems anyway.

Default Data Structure, unless you modified this structure to contain user defined members, this should be empty on all systems

You mention FMCNSHOW, there is no object that must have this name, so I can not see how there could be a conflict.

As to other "user defined" names, I would suggest that you use Process Categories, and be sure to have a rigid naming standard that uses some process model related identifier in front of each object.

To calculate load use the Performance spreadheet in support pac WP01
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
naresh
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:28 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Newbie

Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 3

great thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:
Post new topicReply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum IndexWorkflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographersharing workflow configurations
Jump to:



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.