| Author |
Message
|
| mahek |
 Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 1:40 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Voyager
Joined: 10 Sep 2004
Posts: 87
|
Hi jamac,
According to the doc we have
4)Add a Data Default Connector to the Empty Activity and i am using that and it is working for XP AND 2003
Modeling with Buildtime
To implement an Empty Activity, perform the following modeling steps:
1. Model a dummy UPES for an Empty Activity
2. Model an Empty Activity program
3. Create an Empty Activity as Program Activity within your process model
4. Add a Data Default Connector to the Empty Activity
5. Define Transition Conditions on the outgoing Control Connectors |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jmac |
| Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mahek |
| Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 10 Sep 2004
Posts: 87
|
Hi jamac,
I was not abel to my posting so i posted 3 times .
yes we need this default control connector if any of the conditions are not meet but here i am giving yes yes for both the b and c .
YOU are right but the case which you are telling when both b and c are no then it uses the default control connector then if there is no default connector then there will be a problem |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| hos |
| Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chevalier
Joined: 03 Feb 2002
Posts: 470
|
Hi,
the documentation says that you should select asynchronous synchronization for NOOP program activity. However your setting is
| Quote: |
| SYNCHRONIZATION CHAINED |
. This most probably results in the unexpected behaviour you are seeing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Andy |
| Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 3:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 14 May 2003
Posts: 122
|
I remember there is a bug in buildtime and sychronous/asynchronous setting changes while doing certain steps.
Dont remember exact steps. 
_________________
 Andy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sac |
| Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 44
|
Yea, there is this problem with NoOp activity. The observation that i had for this was that whenever you change any property of NoOp activity,say you change the data container of the activity, then this Asynch property changes to Synch. So need to careful about this.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| seamonsterboy |
| Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 12:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 06 Jan 2004
Posts: 5
Location: Los Angeles
|
We see the same behaviour described in the original post (although we are using 3.4.6 on AIX). Our NOOP activities also never go into error state but do hang. We do have default data connectors on all of them.
According to the IBM doc included a couple of posts ago (page 21) "SYNCHRONIZATION CHAINED /* mode asynchronous */".
Does anyone have an update on this? Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| francoisvdm |
| Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:22 am Post subject: PDF corrupted? |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 09 Aug 2001
Posts: 332
|
The download file from
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=795&context=SW920&uid=swg21078709
is arriving on my side corrupted! Anybody that can forward me a verified copy? Thanks.
_________________
If you do not know the answer or you get the urge to answer with "RTFM" or "Search better in this forum", please refrain from doing so, just move on to the next question. Much appreciated.
Francois van der Merwe |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jmac |
| Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
Done
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| seamonsterboy |
| Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 8:47 am Post subject: IBM Sent us a Patch |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 06 Jan 2004
Posts: 5
Location: Los Angeles
|
| To follow up on the original problem in this thread - IBM sent us a patch for MQWF that fixed this problem on AIX. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
