| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
| Currently inetd for MQ listener is usful in any scenarios ? |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| bruce2359 |
 Posted: Wed May 09, 2018 8:43 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
We applaud your interest in MQ internals. Most of us are equally curious.
I'd like to suggest that you begin you inquiries by first searching google. Google is your friend, and is available 24 hours per day.
In this example, a search for something like 'mq+inetd vs runmqlsr' would have answered some of your questions. Next visit, you might post what you have learned on your own - to share with others.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed May 09, 2018 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| Mangesh1187 wrote: |
| [Just curious about MQ internals. I like to learn & hence explore more about how MQ works internally , beside my regular administration duties. |
Just be aware that things change over time (clearly not as much as I thought!) so judge the value of information in the frame of how old it is.
Also be cautious exploiting this knowledge. Exploiting the internal function of the software not only makes your solution vulnerable to changes between versions, but can affect the running of the queue manager.
| Mangesh1187 wrote: |
| This forum is great place where I get feedback from great MQ experts. |
I give feedback too 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mvic |
| Posted: Wed May 09, 2018 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 2080
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| Just be aware that things change over time (clearly not as much as I thought!) |
About 3 years ago I had some basic programmer education on z/OS.
The instructor loved to joke about option x.y being added to the menus "relatively recently", hence had not been much adopted by the users yet.
"Relatively recently" meant 1986.
Cue laughter in the classroom.
Why use new features on a system that's "just working". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| gbaddeley |
| Posted: Wed May 09, 2018 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 25 Mar 2003
Posts: 2538
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
| mvic wrote: |
About 3 years ago I had some basic programmer education on z/OS.
The instructor loved to joke about option x.y being added to the menus "relatively recently", hence had not been much adopted by the users yet.
"Relatively recently" meant 1986.
Cue laughter in the classroom.
Why use new features on a system that's "just working". |
Some new features seem to take a long time to adopt and work their way into new designs or re-designs, no matter how much value they could add. Eg. MQ internal pub/sub engine introduced in V7.0. We don't have any business apps that use it. Horses for courses I guess.
_________________
Glenn |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
