| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| clustering for local binding qmgrs?? |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| MQMB&WAS |
 Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2018 6:51 am Post subject: clustering for local binding qmgrs?? |
 |
|
Centurion
Joined: 12 Jun 2016
Posts: 130
|
Hello guys,
Does clustering queue managers for an application connecting in local bindings add any value?
Scenario: An app is installed on 3 nodes and has MQ qmgr on each of those 3 nodes, app connects to the qmgr in local bindings. Now, does clustering these 3 qmgrs add any value ?
Appreciate your help. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
Server-bindings add value, as they don’t endure network flows of client-bindings. As such, server-bindings app are faster than client-bindings.
Apps don’t connect to a cluster; rather, they connect to a qmgr, which may or may not have clustered objects.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mvic |
| Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:42 am Post subject: Re: clustering for local binding qmgrs?? |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 2080
|
| MQMB&WAS wrote: |
| Does clustering queue managers for an application connecting in local bindings add any value? |
Yes.
It's an odd question to ask though - what problem are you trying to solve? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:46 am Post subject: Re: clustering for local binding qmgrs?? |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| mvic wrote: |
| MQMB&WAS wrote: |
| Does clustering queue managers for an application connecting in local bindings add any value? |
Yes.
It's an odd question to ask though - what problem are you trying to solve? |
The OP is trying to solve this I think - a variation of the old chestnut of using an MQ cluster as an HA solution.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
