| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
| Problem with the bar file deployment - SOAPRequest node |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| mgk |
 Posted: Fri May 15, 2015 11:16 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Padawan
Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Posts: 1642
|
| Quote: |
| I believe the correct return code for one way would be 204 |
The correct code for one way is normally 202.
Kind regards.
_________________
MGK
The postings I make on this site are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Sun May 17, 2015 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
@mgk do you mean to say the broker does not support a 204?
I do understand that from a performance point of view 202 is what you should be striving for...
However:
from http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616.txt
| Quote: |
Status-Code =
"100" ; Section 10.1.1: Continue
| "101" ; Section 10.1.2: Switching Protocols
| "200" ; Section 10.2.1: OK
| "201" ; Section 10.2.2: Created
| "202" ; Section 10.2.3: Accepted
| "203" ; Section 10.2.4: Non-Authoritative Information
| "204" ; Section 10.2.5: No Content
| "205" ; Section 10.2.6: Reset Content
| "206" ; Section 10.2.7: Partial Content |
So that would be 202 if sending the response immediately (before processing) and 204 if sending the response after processing (success no reply)?
| Quote: |
10.2.3 202 Accepted
The request has been accepted for processing, but the processing has
not been completed. The request might or might not eventually be
acted upon, as it might be disallowed when processing actually takes
place. There is no facility for re-sending a status code from an
asynchronous operation such as this.
.....
10.2.5 204 No Content
The server has fulfilled the request but does not need to return an
entity-body, and might want to return updated metainformation. The
response MAY include new or updated metainformation in the form of
entity-headers, which if present SHOULD be associated with the
requested variant. |
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Gama |
| Posted: Sun May 17, 2015 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 103
Location: Portugal
|
Hi.
| fjb_saper wrote: |
Tell them that their setup is not right. A one way operation should not return a return code of 200. Look it up in the http protocol. I believe the correct return code for one way would be 204 (success but no data returned)  |
Yes a one way shouldn't return a 200, would be a 202.
I tould that to our client but...........
Many thanks to all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Mon May 18, 2015 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| Gama wrote: |
I tould that to our client but...........
Many thanks to all. |
Point them to the spec and ask them what external clients are going to think... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
