| Author |
Message
|
| EricCox |
 Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:48 am Post subject: Broker 6.0 CONTAINS Function |
 |
|
Master
Joined: 08 Apr 2011
Posts: 292
|
Does anyone know if Broker 6.0 supports CONTAINS.
I have it in the 6.1.0.8 toolkit help but can't find a link to any v6.0 documentation.
A link or confirmation would be nice.
Thanks to all as always.
EMC |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
If memory serves it doesn't, and there's no good reason to be changing anything using v6.0 ESQL.
WMBv6.0 is dead. Let it rest in peace, and all the code migrate quietly into that v6.1 night.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| dogorsy |
| Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:39 am Post subject: Re: Broker 6.0 CONTAINS Function |
|
|
Knight
Joined: 13 Mar 2013
Posts: 553
Location: Home Office
|
| EricCox wrote: |
Does anyone know if Broker 6.0 supports CONTAINS.
I have it in the 6.1.0.8 toolkit help but can't find a link to any v6.0 documentation.
A link or confirmation would be nice.
Thanks to all as always.
EMC |
NO. and as Vitor said, you need to upgrade.
And , you can also code it and try it. If it fails, then whether it is supported or not, is irrelevant, because your WMB version is unsupported !! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| EricCox |
| Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 6:04 am Post subject: Thanks |
|
|
Master
Joined: 08 Apr 2011
Posts: 292
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| NealM |
| Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 22 Feb 2011
Posts: 230
Location: NC or Utah (depends)
|
| Being a packrat, I still have the old ESQL manuals. The CONTAINS() function first appears in v6.1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mgk |
| Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Padawan
Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Posts: 1642
|
If memory serves, it first appeared in 6.1.0.4...
King regards,
_________________
MGK
The postings I make on this site are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK
|
Am I in a time-warp? I thought WMB 6.1 was unsupported as well.
_________________
Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| zpat wrote: |
| Am I in a time-warp? I thought WMB 6.1 was unsupported as well. |
Hence "...migrate quietly into the night"
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| EricCox |
| Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2013 6:21 am Post subject: Migration Underway |
|
|
Master
Joined: 08 Apr 2011
Posts: 292
|
The migration is underway. We are still supporting a legacy which is going quiet into the night.
Thanks,
Eric |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
