ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » Refresh Pack 7.0.1.3

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Refresh Pack 7.0.1.3 « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
blovell
PostPosted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 11:39 am    Post subject: Refresh Pack 7.0.1.3 Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 63
Location: Alpharetta, GA

We have been running MQ 7.0.0.1 on Red Hat ES server i386 for the past year. At some point we identified some possible Shared Memory leaks and decided to upgrade to 7.0.1.3. We have been running the 1.3 refresh pack in QA for the past few months w/o issue. Once the new refresh pack was installed many of our SDR channels are now alarming AMQ9206 events. (5-6 an hour). all connections are to various networks and were not experiencing issues prior to upgrade.

MQ event:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/25/2011 10:06:50 AM - Process(12807.1) User(mqm) Program(runmqchl)
Host(MQPROD)
AMQ9206: Error sending data to host X.X.X.X(1414).

EXPLANATION:
An error occurred sending data over TCP/IP to X.X.X.X(1414). This may be
due to a communications failure.
ACTION:
The return code from the TCP/IP(write) call was 110 X('6E'). Record these
values and tell your systems administrator.
----- amqccita.c : 2617 -------------------------------------------------------
03/25/2011 10:06:50 AM - Process(12807.1) User(mqm) Program(runmqchl)
Host(MQPROD)
AMQ9999: Channel program ended abnormally.

EXPLANATION:
Channel program 'LOCALQMGR.REMOTEQMGR' ended abnormally.
ACTION:
Look at previous error messages for channel program 'LOCALQMGR.REMOTEQMGR' in the
error files to determine the cause of the failure.
----- amqrccca.c : 921 --------------------------------------------------------


Based on the output event (110) it points to a TCP timeout during the WRITE. I would feel it was network related, however a rollback to 7.0.0.1 clears the issue.

At a complete lost. It is not creating and FDC files, below is a copy of my QM.INI.

$ cat qm.ini
#*******************************************************************#
#* Module Name: qm.ini *#
#* Type : WebSphere MQ queue manager configuration file *#
# Function : Define the configuration of a single queue manager *#
#* *#
#*******************************************************************#
#* Notes : *#
#* 1) This file defines the configuration of the queue manager *#
#* *#
#*******************************************************************#
ExitPath:
ExitsDefaultPath=/var/mqm/exits/
ExitsDefaultPath64=/var/mqm/exits64/
#* *#
#* *#
Log:
LogPrimaryFiles=50
LogSecondaryFiles=20
LogFilePages=4096
LogType=CIRCULAR
LogBufferPages=0
LogPath=/var/mqm/log/QMGR/
LogWriteIntegrity=TripleWrite
Channels:
MaxChannels=250
TCP:
KeepAlive=yes
Service:
Name=AuthorizationService
EntryPoints=13
ServiceComponent:
Service=AuthorizationService
Name=MQSeries.UNIX.auth.service
Module=/opt/mqm/lib/amqzfu
ComponentDataSize=0
SSL:
OCSPAuthentication=OPTIONAL

Any thoughts?
_________________
Bradley M. Lovell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
mqjeff
PostPosted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 12:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447

It probably is network related, in that there is some configuration in the network that exposes a vulnerability in 7.0.1.3.

You should open a PMR. You should, before you open the PMR, take steps to recreate the issue, and document those steps. Then take an MQ trace of the issue when it fails on 7.0.1.3 and from the same system at 7.0.0.1.

You should also confirm that you didn't need to update your RedHat before moving to 7.0.1.3. You might, for example, have a lower level of the C libraries or TCP/IP stack than are supported at 7.0.1.3 (because of things like the issue you experience).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blovell
PostPosted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 6:38 am    Post subject: Cannot seem to find Pre-Reqs Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 63
Location: Alpharetta, GA

I have been looking for the kernel specs on the TCP/IP stack. I cannot seem to find specific specs for the IPV4 specs for 7.0.1.3.

I found the link to correct some of our shared memory issues, but i cannot seem to find kernel specs on the IP stack.
_________________
Bradley M. Lovell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
mqjeff
PostPosted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 6:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=171&uid=swg27011929

Quote:
# For SSL/TLS support on Red Hat Enterprise Linux V4, patch compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.3 or later is required.
# For SSL/TLS support on Red Hat Enterprise Linux V5, patch compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-61 or later is required.
# For SSL/TLS support on Red Hat Enterprise Linux V6, patch compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-69 or later is required.


This may not specifically apply, but again check your overall RedHat level.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blovell
PostPosted: Fri May 27, 2011 12:01 pm    Post subject: Red Hat Kernel Params Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 63
Location: Alpharetta, GA

All of the Kernel Params regarding the TCPIP stack appear to be valid. I am capturing some before and after details and hoping I can get an answer.
_________________
Bradley M. Lovell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Fri May 27, 2011 1:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

You should also look into the fixes for 7.0.1.4 AND 7.0.1.5 as both are out and then decide whether you want them.
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
blovell
PostPosted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:50 am    Post subject: 7.0.1.5 Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 63
Location: Alpharetta, GA

I am going to install 7.0.1.5 in prepro with the hopes it will correct. Results to be posted shortly.
_________________
Bradley M. Lovell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
blovell
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 63
Location: Alpharetta, GA

By shortly i mean a couple of months later.

The upgrade to 7.0.1.5 has done nothing for the 9206 event.
_________________
Bradley M. Lovell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
mvic
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 5:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi

Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 2080

blovell wrote:
The upgrade to 7.0.1.5 has done nothing for the 9206 event.

That's because the error is coming from the network, so is unrelated to the software running on the machine where this error is logged.

"The return code from the TCP/IP(write) call was 110 X('6E')."

I think 110 (x6E) is ETIMEDOUT on Linux (ask your Linux OS support person). So maybe you have some connectivity problem, the remote server is down for a reboot, etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blovell
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 11:39 am    Post subject: MQ Channels complaining 9206 too all of my remote QMGR's. Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 63
Location: Alpharetta, GA

My 7.0.1.3 QMGR talks to multiple remote QMGR's. Since the upgrade i receive the below events to all remote QMGR's. These reside on different networks, accessed through multiple ingress connection points to my internal infrastructure.

I agree it has to be network related, but so far looking for needle in haystack. Odd I don't see similar behavior prior to refresh pack.
_________________
Bradley M. Lovell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

and a telnet to the host + mqport works fine?
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
blovell
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 10:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 63
Location: Alpharetta, GA

That is correct. Telnet to the complaining IP/Port results in the ^escape character response..

My suspicion is that their is a timer for packet return that is manipulated by the refresh pack (to a smaller value) that is exposing this.

While the underlying root cause is most likely network latency, this value was adjusted with refresh pack, and my hope would be to adjust it to ignore. (It obviously isn't causing that much impact.) I just want the alarm to go away.


_________________
Bradley M. Lovell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » Refresh Pack 7.0.1.3
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.