| Author |
Message
|
| camauz |
 Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:15 am Post subject: WebSphere MQ <-> HornetQ JMS bridge |
 |
|
Acolyte
Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 52
Location: Mojan, Italy
|
Dear all,
googling "hornetq websphere mq bridge" does not show any commercial available product 
This is the use case: there is a WebSphere MQ backbone and there is a rising world populated by Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss).
The integration between WebSphere MQ and RH EAP is not optimal and paying for a massive WebSphere MQ deployment (server or Extended Transactional Client) sinks the business case.
In my honest opinion there's room for a commercial product able to stay between WebSphere MQ messaging and HornetQ messaging: a bridge between these two lands.
What do you think about it?
Cheers
Ch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
Did you look at the new licencing model with 7.5? No more fees for the transactional client! Talk to your IBM rep. 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:44 am Post subject: Re: WebSphere MQ <-> HornetQ JMS bridge |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| camauz wrote: |
In my honest opinion there's room for a commercial product able to stay between WebSphere MQ messaging and HornetQ messaging: a bridge between these two lands.
What do you think about it? |
I think anyone who goes this route is missing the bus.
There's absolutely no reason to use hornetMQ. use MQ as the only JMS provider in your network, problem solved.
Please bear in mind, I feel the same way about SIBus. Why trust any messaging technology less than ten years old with your valuable business data? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:55 am Post subject: Re: WebSphere MQ <-> HornetQ JMS bridge |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| camauz wrote: |
In my honest opinion there's room for a commercial product able to stay between WebSphere MQ messaging and HornetQ messaging: a bridge between these two lands.
What do you think about it? |
Why would you use 2 products to need a bridge? Taking aside the pure cost of licensing, you've doubled the amount of technical knowledge you need to support your messaging system which either means more people (which costs more) or brighter people (which costs more).
You've also introduced with this mythical bridge 2 more points of contention and failure; one at each of the joins with the queue products. At best this muddies your support model and slows down fault finding.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| camauz |
| Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 52
Location: Mojan, Italy
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
Note this important bit
| Quote: |
| for all supported versions of WebSphere MQ queue manager. |
Allow me to repeat the important bit
| Quote: |
| for all supported versions |
Not just 7.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
