| Author |
Message
|
| maxy_14in |
 Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:52 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Posts: 43
|
as per the error code => Address is already in use, If you attempt to set up a server on a port that is already is in use, you will get this error.
I changed the port number of both the Listners to 1450 and 1451 respectively. I also changed the connname of both the Sender channels.
Recycled the Qmgrs, and then tried to start the Sender Channel.
My attempt again failed with the same "Retrying" State. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| maxy_14in |
| Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Posts: 43
|
Recieving the similar errors when PING CHANNEL (QMA.QMB)
the log file responses are
QMA side:
4/15/2010 12:47:17 - Process(3904.1) User(MAXY) Program(amqrcmla.exe)
AMQ9248: The program could not bind to a TCP/IP socket.
EXPLANATION:
The attempt to bind to socket '127.0.0.1(1450)' failed with return code 10048.
The failing TCP/IP call was 'bind'. The most likely cause of this problem is
incorrect configuration of the TCP/IP local address or incorrect start and end
port parameters.
ACTION:
Contact the system administrator. If the problem persists contact your IBM
support center.
QMB Side:
4/15/2010 12:46:58 - Process(3676.1) User(MAXY) Program(amqrcmla.exe)
AMQ9248: The program could not bind to a TCP/IP socket.
EXPLANATION:
The attempt to bind to socket '127.0.0.1(1451)' failed with return code 10048.
The failing TCP/IP call was 'bind'. The most likely cause of this problem is
incorrect configuration of the TCP/IP local address or incorrect start and end
port parameters.
ACTION:
Contact the system administrator. If the problem persists contact your IBM
support center
Last edited by maxy_14in on Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:23 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
1) Follow my advice and check what's actually using the ports in question
2) Ask yourself why your WMQ system processes are running under what looks like a personal id
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| maxy_14in |
| Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Posts: 43
|
Vitor thank you for ur advice.
I modified the Listner IP the 127.0.0.1 with "localhost" on both the QMGR's.
The sender channel on QMA i.e., (QMA.QMB) and the reciever channel on QMB started working its in running state. Whereas the sender on QMB (QMB.QMA) is in retrying state.
I cross checked by putting message on Remote Q Q2 on QMA. It received on the Q2 of QMB. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| maxy_14in wrote: |
The sender channel on QMA i.e., (QMA.QMB) and the reciever channel on QMB started working its in running state. Whereas the sender on QMB (QMB.QMA) is in retrying state.
|
Which gives you valuable diagnostic information.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| maxy_14in |
| Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Posts: 43
|
| Does that mean on a local system we can define only one sender and receiver channel ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| maxy_14in wrote: |
| Does that mean on a local system we can define only one sender and receiver channel ? |
No. Why would it mean that?
Try looking at the errors and your setup, think about what's happening and debug the problem rather than just guess.
FWIW I have 5 cross connected queue managers running on this laptop at the moment.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| maxy_14in |
| Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Posts: 43
|
oh ohk ... i will try creating another set of QMGR's and try to establish a Cluster environment and see if it works fine for me ...
But still the Sender channel from QMB isn't moving to running state from retrying. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
confirm the listener is running!
netstat /an|find /i "listen"
Confirm that you can telnet localhost 1415
If you can't connect to the listener, you won't be able to run *any* kind of channel, cluster or not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| maxy_14in wrote: |
| oh ohk ... i will try creating another set of QMGR's and try to establish a Cluster environment and see if it works fine for me ... |
If the point to point channel isn't working, what makes you think the cluster channel will have more luck? It's all using the same network architecture. 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9471
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
| Quote: |
| Trying to establish point to point communication as described in the “MQ Primer”. |
Much better documentation on channel setup is to be found in the WMQ Intercommunications manual.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
