Author |
Message
|
au@kosa |
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:07 pm Post subject: SOAP/JMS |
|
|
 Centurion
Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 103 Location: pune
|
Is there any inbuilt support for SOAP/JMS similar to SOAP/HTTP. _________________ Regards,
au@kosa
IBM Certified SOA Solution Designer/Associate |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AkankshA |
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 12 Jan 2006 Posts: 1494 Location: Singapore
|
Wont JMS nodes fall in this catagory ??
or did i got you wrong.. may be you can be a little more descriptive... _________________ Cheers |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
au@kosa |
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Centurion
Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 103 Location: pune
|
What i am looking is there a choice of protocol (HTTP/JMS/MQ) when i dropped a WSDL into Editor. I knew a SOAPInput /SOAP Reply nodes are created but they support SOAP over HTTP only. Do i have a choice where i can change the underlying protocol. _________________ Regards,
au@kosa
IBM Certified SOA Solution Designer/Associate |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AkankshA |
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 12 Jan 2006 Posts: 1494 Location: Singapore
|
AFAIK thw wsdl having jms destinations can not be used in wmb.. Hence As far as i know the answer is NO.... though i stand to be corrected here _________________ Cheers |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
au@kosa |
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Centurion
Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 103 Location: pune
|
Akansha,
Thanks for the reply. Can i use SOAP over MQ (multiple operations) out of the box in Message Broker. _________________ Regards,
au@kosa
IBM Certified SOA Solution Designer/Associate |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
au@kosa wrote: |
Can i use SOAP over MQ (multiple operations) out of the box in Message Broker. |
 _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
au@kosa |
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Centurion
Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 103 Location: pune
|
Vitor,
My Apology. I will rephrase my wordings
In Message Broker 6.0 too handled SOAP for MQ as well as HTTP (MQ Input Node and HTTP Input Node) either through concept of category files or without any message set just taking the SOAP messages and extract the SOAP envelope through CN or JCN.
The MB 6.1 comes with SOAP nodes dedicated to SOAP but it seems it is dedicated to SOAP/HTTP. Is there any similar nodes for SOAP/MQ.
Or something i am missing. Is there any way the SOAP nodes can be tuned for MQ protocol. _________________ Regards,
au@kosa
IBM Certified SOA Solution Designer/Associate |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
au@kosa wrote: |
My Apology. I will rephrase my wordings |
My apology in return. I shall rephrase my answer, then take my anti-smartass medication.
au@kosa wrote: |
Is there any way the SOAP nodes can be tuned for MQ protocol. |
AFAIK the SOAPInput/SOAPReply nodes are specific to http as it's intended to allow WMB to act as a Web Service. The other input/output nodes likewise use http because they interface with other Web services.
But it's perfectly straightforward to handle a SOAP message that arrives over WMQ using the other nodes in the toolkit. Been there, done that, works a treat. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
au@kosa |
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Centurion
Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 103 Location: pune
|
Thanks Vitor,
I wish one day message broker will support Abstract WSDL model where actual binding to transport (MQ/JMS/HTTP) can be associated at Runtime/Deployment Time.
i saw in one of the OPen Source tool (Open ESB) and it give a great comfort to developers. _________________ Regards,
au@kosa
IBM Certified SOA Solution Designer/Associate |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mqjeff |
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
|
First there has to be a standards approved alternate transport for SOAP rather than just HTTP.
Right, mgk? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
goffinf |
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chevalier
Joined: 05 Nov 2005 Posts: 401
|
Well perhaps, but there have been a number of proposals for JMS and native MQ bindings around for quite some time. IBM has published some docs on this together with example WSDLs. I don't see why Message Broker has to be constrained by the lack of some universal protocol standard, thats clearly not going to happen. Most standards are the result of the market traction of early proposals that become de-facto with or without IETF, W3c, OASIS or any other august body support. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
elvis_gn |
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Padawan
Joined: 08 Oct 2004 Posts: 1905 Location: Dubai
|
au@kosa wrote: |
Thanks Vitor,
I wish one day message broker will support Abstract WSDL model where actual binding to transport (MQ/JMS/HTTP) can be associated at Runtime/Deployment Time.
i saw in one of the OPen Source tool (Open ESB) and it give a great comfort to developers. |
Hmmm....I have a feeling I read somewhere in the v7 features that the WSRR nodes now supported WSDL MQ Bindings...but I could be wrong, or might have read it in some other context.
Regards. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
simon.starkie |
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 24 Mar 2002 Posts: 180
|
My Customer is also asking for a SOAP/JMS web service hosted by WMB6.1.
They want a "one-way" request-only web service using SOAP/JMS.
They want to use JMS as the transport instead of HTTP.
But WMB6.1 only supports HTTP as the transport for web services.
The WSDL transport would look something like this:
<soap:binding style="document" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/jms"/>
Has anyone here developed a workaround other than using MQ or should I resort to WAS 7?
Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|