| Author |
Message
|
| fredand44 |
 Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:38 am Post subject: Is it complex to translate between JMS and MQ? |
 |
|
Acolyte
Joined: 14 Feb 2006
Posts: 63
|
Hello!
I wonder if it is a complex task to translate a JMS message (javax.jms.Message) to a MQ message (com.do_not_remember_the_package.MQMessage)?
I participate in a project where we need to do this translation.
(I must admit that I thougt ther was no need of a translation)
I would love to get hear some experiance and perhaps if ther is some "best practice"
Best regards
Fredrik |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
It's not quite clear why you would need to do this translation... ?
You can read and write from MQ using JMS classes.
There's been some discussion on this before, though - but it's been a year or two.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fredand44 |
| Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:34 am Post subject: I guess... |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 14 Feb 2006
Posts: 63
|
Hello!
Thanks for your reply.
I guess they would like to make sure that we translate from a object of javax.jms.Message to a MQMessage like:
JMS.getJMSPriority() - > MQ.correspondingMethod()/or property
JMS.getJMSRedelivered() - > MQ.correspondingMethod()/or property
...
... for each method or property in JMS to MQ. Right now I do not know the exact reason.
Me my self thought that JMS would be transparent to MQ.
Please comment
Best regards
Fredrik |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20767
Location: LI,NY
|
Find out the exact requirement and get back to us...
Enjoy 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
Also, not all JMS properties are directly translatable into MQ "properties".
Some are fields on the MQMD, and some are name/value pairs in the MQRHF2.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fredand44 |
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:10 pm Post subject: Thanks for all replies! |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 14 Feb 2006
Posts: 63
|
Hello!
Thanks for all replies!
I will the get back with more detailed info as soon as I got them!
Thanks in advance a lot!!!
/Fredrik |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
