| Author |
Message
|
| rmah |
 Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:04 am Post subject: SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE DESTROYED |
 |
|
Centurion
Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 142
|
A tester has deleted the SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE.
Can this queue be recreated like any normal queue, are are there special steps or precautions which need to be taken first?
Yes, I realize testers shouldn't be a part of the mqm group and be given limited accessibility. However, these testers needed the freedom to do their tests.......................................
_________________
MQ 6.0.2.3
Broker 6.0.0.7
for Linux |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
strmqm -c
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| rmah |
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 142
|
| jefflowrey wrote: |
| strmqm -c |
GREAT!!!
I'll try this....
_________________
MQ 6.0.2.3
Broker 6.0.0.7
for Linux |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 10:49 pm Post subject: Re: SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE DESTROYED |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| rmah wrote: |
| Yes, I realize testers shouldn't be a part of the mqm group and be given limited accessibility. However, these testers needed the freedom to do their tests....................................... |
That's a lot of freedom, and must be some very odd tests! 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:44 am Post subject: Re: SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE DESTROYED |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| rmah wrote: |
| Yes, I realize testers shouldn't be a part of the mqm group and be given limited accessibility. However, these testers needed the freedom to do their tests....................................... |
That's a lot of freedom, and must be some very odd tests! |
I guess "What happens when you destroy the qmgr while it is working?" must have been part of their tests... 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:24 am Post subject: Re: SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE DESTROYED |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| fjb_saper wrote: |
| Vitor wrote: |
| rmah wrote: |
| Yes, I realize testers shouldn't be a part of the mqm group and be given limited accessibility. However, these testers needed the freedom to do their tests....................................... |
That's a lot of freedom, and must be some very odd tests! |
I guess "What happens when you destroy the qmgr while it is working?" must have been part of their tests... |
Now this is the kind of test team I could be part of - kamakazi testing! 
Or they're testing resiliance - "what happens if an administrator randomly deletes part of the system - does it automatically recover?"
I wonder if Ford's ever crash tested a car by unbolting bits of it at 70mph? 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| belchman |
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 386
Location: Ohio, USA
|
What do the testers care. They get the bonus for hitting the delivery date and the MQA has the stroke trying to keep things running. Then, if they miss the date, "the MQA must have deleted the SYSTEM.CLUSTER.XMIT.QUEUE". I am the  incarnate.
_________________
Make three correct guesses consecutively and you will establish a reputation as an expert. ~ Laurence J. Peter |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| UglyAngelX |
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 04 Dec 2001
Posts: 90
Location: BEARS FAN IN STEELER COUNTRY
|
Who needs a Test or QA environment, when we have Production!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
| UglyAngelX wrote: |
| Who needs a Test or QA environment, when we have Production! |
This is not as rare or as humorous as you think it is.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jsware |
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chevalier
Joined: 17 May 2001
Posts: 455
|
What is this "testing" of which you speak...
_________________
Regards
John
The pain of low quaility far outlasts the joy of low price. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
| scottj2512 wrote: |
| What is this "testing" of which you speak... |
That's what happens just before the pager goes off at 2 am on a Friday night, after you've just flopped into bed to try to sleep off closing the bar.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| jefflowrey wrote: |
That's what happens just before the pager goes off at 2 am on a Friday night, after you've just flopped into bed to try to sleep off closing the bar. |
Jeff you're still too young for that, especially if you did close the bar. Sleep is not what would be on my mind...
Talk about being caught at a disadvantage...
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
FJ - I think I am older than you think I am.
Also, I stand by my choice of the word "try".
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
