|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
 |
|
BMC: MQ Operator |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
Author |
Message
|
eh1921-sbc |
Posted: Wed May 22, 2002 6:45 am Post subject: BMC: MQ Operator |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 09 May 2002 Posts: 2
|
We use BMC/Patrol's: "MQ Operator" for monitoring our MQSeries environment on MVS/OS390, Unix, and NT. It provides a GUI tool for looking at each server, and each QMGR on each server. It automatically discovers all queues, channels, etc. It provides a historical graph to track the DQepth. It provides alarm capabilities - you set the threshold for QDepth, and when the threshold is exceeded, then an alarm/event is generated. We send our events out to support staff via pages and email. The GUI tracks all objects (Local Queues, Alias queues, Model queues, Remote queues, XMIT queues, DLQ, Clusters, Channels - including CLNTCONN, CLUSRCVR, CLUSSDR, RCVR, RQSTR, SDR, SVR, SVRCONN, etc.
We have successfully detected (via monitoring) QDepth thresholds exceeded, and notified support groups hundreds (maybe thousands) of times, allowing the support groups to fix the application, or whatever problem may be causing the queues to backup.
The GUI provides a means of Managing your MQ environment. Just for messages alone, the GUI allows you to peform the following functions for messages: copy, move, delete, unload, requeue, modify, and display. For Channels, the GUI allows you to start and stop the channel. For Channel attributes, you can view, change, copy, and delete. For the QMGR itself, the list is so long I won't even start on all the functions.
For what it is worth, I do NOT work for BMC, and I do not own any BMC stock.
BMC Patrol's MQ Operator has been a great product to support. Their technical support staff is knowledgable and helpful. Quick to respond. Knowldege about traces, and logfiles, AMQERR files, and FDC files, etc.
I have supported the Tivoli TME product in years past in our distributed environment. It is an OK product. It was far too labor intensive - on the TEC rules side of things. I prefer BMC Patrol, but that is my preference for my own reasons. If someone prefers a different vendor - that is fine with me. I am not looking to debate vendors. I only wanted to state that BMC/Patrol's MQ Operator has been a stable, thorough, complete product, that has met our needs for numerous unix, NT, and OS/390 systems that are running MQSeries.
eric |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
arinduer |
Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2002 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Acolyte
Joined: 13 Aug 2001 Posts: 50 Location: Phuket, Thailand
|
I can vouch for Eric. I've been using PMQO (UNIX and NT) for 3 and a half years for various platforms: Sun Solaris, NT, Open VMS, HP, IBM OS/390. In addition to all that Eric said above, I also like the reporting. We can see activity reports by object (ie. Local queues, Sender Channels, RCVR Channels, etc...). We've even customized the permission settings so that First Line support has less privledges, and that 2nd and 3rd line MQ Support has more. And, no. I don't work for BMC and I don't own BMC stock. And, no one in BMC payed me for these comments.
But if someone from BMC appreciates my comments, buy me a beer or something.
--arinduer |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|