| Author |
Message
|
| JohnRodey |
 Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:24 am Post subject: JNDI Repository - LDAP vs MQCONTEXT vs FILE BASED |
 |
|
Centurion
Joined: 13 Apr 2005
Posts: 103
|
Has anyone done any performance testing to show which solution is best for JNDI mappings?
Our three options are LDAP, MQContext and a JNDI file stored on a shared drive. Are there any other options worth looking into?
I did some quick tests and it appeared that MQContext was slower when issuing lookups and connections. Is this expected?
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
You do not specify your environment:
Stand alone JMS app
WAS app
WAS client app
Could you as well be more specific on "MQ Context"
How should we know 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| vennela |
| Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002
Posts: 4055
Location: Hyderabad, India
|
| fjb_saper wrote: |
Could you as well be more specific on "MQ Context"
|
I think he means support pack
ME01: WebSphere MQ - Initial Context Factory |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| JohnRodey |
| Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 13 Apr 2005
Posts: 103
|
| JMS, no WAS. And ME01 as vennela said. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| JohnRodey wrote: |
| JMS, no WAS. And ME01 as vennela said. |
I would say it is a toss between File Context and MQ Context.
I believe that LDAP is going to be a little bit heavier on the classes you need loaded...
Enjoy 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
