| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Application Triggering a BATCH JCL job |
bruce2359
Replies: 5
Views: 1830
|
 Forum: Mainframe, CICS, TXSeries Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2025 8:22 am Subject: Application Triggering a BATCH JCL job |
This wheel has already been invented.
Read this https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/cics-ts/5.5.0?topic=adapter-task-initiator-trigger-monitor-ckti |
| Topic: Application Triggering a BATCH JCL job |
bruce2359
Replies: 5
Views: 1830
|
Forum: Mainframe, CICS, TXSeries Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2025 7:40 am Subject: Application Triggering a BATCH JCL job |
Or, you can write your own trigger monitor that MQGETs the trigger event message, and then submits the named jobstream off to JES.
Midrange runmqtrm source is provided in samples directory. |
| Topic: Application Triggering a BATCH JCL job |
bruce2359
Replies: 5
Views: 1830
|
Forum: Mainframe, CICS, TXSeries Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2025 3:11 pm Subject: Application Triggering a BATCH JCL job |
| What trigger monitor application (see midrange runmqtrm) are you using to submit the JCL to JES? There was a support pac MA12 that provided that service on MQ for z/OS. |
| Topic: Question on variable substitution |
bruce2359
Replies: 4
Views: 1660
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2025 10:01 am Subject: Question on variable substitution |
| What precisely doesn?t work? |
| Topic: '22 - Invalid argument' from semop |
bruce2359
Replies: 4
Views: 6994
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2025 6:03 pm Subject: '22 - Invalid argument' from semop |
Google searched for 'probe Id :- XY324103+mq+v8.0.0.0' found this:
https://www.google.com/search?q=Probe+Id+%3A-+XY324103+%2Bmq%2Bv8.0.0.0&rlz=1C1YTUH_enUS1016US1016&oq=Probe+Id+%3A-+XY324103 ... |
| Topic: '22 - Invalid argument' from semop |
bruce2359
Replies: 4
Views: 6994
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2025 6:55 am Subject: '22 - Invalid argument' from semop |
Other than posting here, what research have you done? What were the results? Did you open a PMR with IBM?
Did you research Probe Id :- XY324103 |
| Topic: ibmconstant for display cluster qmgr |
bruce2359
Replies: 4
Views: 6795
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 5:05 am Subject: ibmconstant for display cluster qmgr |
| Not sure what exactly you want to display, but found this https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/ibm-mq/9.4.x?topic=reference-mq-cluster-commands-attributes |
| Topic: CCDT and WAS CONNAME |
bruce2359
Replies: 9
Views: 51054
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2025 9:28 am Subject: CCDT and WAS CONNAME |
Official IBM doc
Specify CONNAME as a comma-separated list of names of machines for the stated TRPTYPE.
... but then offers an easily misunderstood and copied typo example with a space separating n ... |
| Topic: chlauth rules precedence |
bruce2359
Replies: 1
Views: 22471
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Mon May 26, 2025 6:07 pm Subject: chlauth rules precedence |
| Please don't triple post. |
| Topic: MQ chlauth rules |
bruce2359
Replies: 1
Views: 26940
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon May 26, 2025 6:06 pm Subject: MQ chlauth rules |
| Please don't double post. |
| Topic: chlauth rules precedence |
bruce2359
Replies: 4
Views: 69683
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon May 26, 2025 6:05 pm Subject: chlauth rules precedence |
| A quick google search for 'CHLAUTH PRECEDENCE' resulted in a variety of hits. I like this one https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/system/files/inline-files/Techdoc-7041997-4-CHLAUTH%20_0.pdf |
| Topic: GCM Cipher Data limit - AMQ9288E |
bruce2359
Replies: 8
Views: 65314
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Sat May 03, 2025 1:33 pm Subject: GCM Cipher Data limit - AMQ9288E |
From Response
This error can be avoided in one of the following ways:
(a) Use secret key reset to ensure that the session key is reset before the data transfer limit is exceeded.
(b) Use a stronger ... |
| Topic: GCM Cipher Data limit - AMQ9288E |
bruce2359
Replies: 8
Views: 65314
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Sat May 03, 2025 1:12 pm Subject: GCM Cipher Data limit - AMQ9288E |
| Handshake should be subsecond. Other than the AMQ9288E, what problem are you seeing? Missing SLA?s, for example? |
| Topic: GCM Cipher Data limit - AMQ9288E |
bruce2359
Replies: 8
Views: 65314
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Sat May 03, 2025 8:06 am Subject: GCM Cipher Data limit - AMQ9288E |
| For curiosity? Or for what purpose? |
| Topic: GCM Cipher Data limit - AMQ9288E |
bruce2359
Replies: 8
Views: 65314
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Fri May 02, 2025 2:14 pm Subject: GCM Cipher Data limit - AMQ9288E |
Searched google for 23726566
Found this
https://community.ibm.com/community/user/blogs/mick-gray1/2019/10/25/tls-13-support-and-ibm-security-access-manager |
