| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| MQSI platform based comparison |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| yaakovd |
 Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:32 pm Post subject: MQSI platform based comparison |
 |
|
Partisan
Joined: 20 Jan 2003
Posts: 319
Location: Israel
|
Any comparison available for MQSI 2.1 on AIX, HP-UX and SUN-Solaris?
Perfomance, problems...
_________________
Best regards.
Yaakov
SWG, IBM Commerce, Israel |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Ian |
| Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2003 5:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 22 Nov 2002
Posts: 152
Location: London, UK
|
Hi,
The following SupportPacs are available on the IBM website
Category 2 : Performance Reports
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/integration/support/supportpacs/perfreppacs.html
IP66: WebSphere MQ Integrator for AIX V2.1 - Performance report
IP67: WebSphere MQ Integrator for Sun Solaris V2.1 - Performance report
IP68: WebSphere MQ Integrator for HP-UX V2.1 - Performance report
_________________
Regards, Ian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| EddieA |
| Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2003 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 28 Jun 2001
Posts: 2453
Location: Los Angeles
|
Also take a look at Support Pac IP03. It's a GUI tool that lets you model various Node configurations and gives some Performance indications. You can just change the Platform to see the relative differences between platforms.
Cheers,
_________________
Eddie Atherton
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V6.1
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V7.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mpuetz |
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2003 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 05 Jul 2001
Posts: 149
Location: IBM/Central WebSphere Services
|
Hi,
one particular thing to consider is memory use:
The platforms differ significantly in the amount of heap memory
available to a message flow, which can be relevant for you
if you are using large messages (> 10MB).
AIX: approx 1.7GB (default 512MB, need to patch dataflowengine to get more segments)
HPUX: 2GB
Solaris: 4GB
I.e. for large message processing, Solaris might be your friend.
Don't forget the Intel Platforms either. They are mostly overlooked
as production systems, but certainly offer the best performance/price
ratio and from my 2 years experience, the Windows version of WMQI
showed fewer bugs, especially with regards to database access.
With WMQI 5.0 available for Linux, Intel based hardware will become
very attractive.
If highest available is your goal, zOS is a must, because of MQ's Shared Queues on that platform.
If memory is not a concern and you don't trust Linux or W2000, I'd probably recommend AIX, because that platform and the windows
platform, receive the most beating.
_________________
Mathias Puetz
IBM/Central WebSphere Services
WebSphere Business Integration Specialist |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
