| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Embedded JMS Vs MQ JMS |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| ssg |
 Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2003 4:10 am Post subject: Embedded JMS Vs MQ JMS |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 1
|
Hi, I want to use JMS with WebSphere. Currently I have WAS AE4.0.5. options for OS: AIX and WinNT/Win2000. I would basically use JMS pub/sub Topics. I am using MQ JMS now. I want to know if i can choose Embedded JMS over MQ JMS. Can anyone tell me about the performance issues regarding these options? Any 'watch-outs' or warnings? Any inputs would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| bower5932 |
| Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Aug 2001
Posts: 3023
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
|
Embedded JMS is a "bundling" of the MQ 5.3 product and a variant of the WMQ Event Broker product. This bundling is only available with WAS 5. If you are running an earlier version of WAS, you'll need to install MQ and one of the brokers (MA0C, WMQ EB, WMQI).
As far as performance is concerned, I know that the WMQEB is tailored for high-speed pub/sub for non-durable subscribers. According to a presentation at the MQ conference, this engine is supposed to work its way into the WMQI product.
One other gotcha, is the fact that the embedded JMS has a license restriction that prohibits you from using it to talk to a regular MQ. It is only for communication inside of WAS. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
