| Author |
Message
|
| jb668 |
 Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 6:21 am Post subject: May be dumb question about RDQM |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 08 Aug 2019
Posts: 1
|
This may be a dumb question, but our IBM guy either doesn't understand the question or can't actually answer it
We are looking at RDQM to replace our single point of failure gateway queue managers.
We still need the clusters for applications that can work with them directly.
We can't seem to get an answer as to whether we can just plug in RDQM to be the replacements for the gateway queues and working with the clusters. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 8:52 am Post subject: Re: May be dumb question about RDQM |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| jb668 wrote: |
| We can't seem to get an answer as to whether we can just plug in RDQM to be the replacements for the gateway queues and working with the clusters. |
RDQM is an HA solution using 3 servers to protect 1 queue manager. What that queue manager is doing with it's life is a separate question.
So in this example, whichever of the RDQM servers is running the queue manager will have the floating IP address associated with RDQM. Channels connecting to this queue manager will reference this IP address rather than the IP address of any of the servers.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| gbaddeley |
| Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 3:50 pm Post subject: Re: May be dumb question about RDQM |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 25 Mar 2003
Posts: 2538
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
| jb668 wrote: |
| ...We are looking at RDQM to replace our single point of failure gateway queue managers... |
What are the single points of failure? What solutions have you considered?
_________________
Glenn |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| viMQ |
| Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2020 12:32 am Post subject: Re: May be dumb question about RDQM |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 10 Sep 2020
Posts: 1
|
| Vitor wrote: |
So in this example, whichever of the RDQM servers is running the queue manager will have the floating IP address associated with RDQM. Channels connecting to this queue manager will reference this IP address rather than the IP address of any of the servers. |
Quick question on using the Floating IP in RDQM. Can multiple queue managers share the same floating IP given that each queue managers listen on different port? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2020 4:58 am Post subject: Re: May be dumb question about RDQM |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20763
Location: LI,NY
|
| viMQ wrote: |
| Vitor wrote: |
So in this example, whichever of the RDQM servers is running the queue manager will have the floating IP address associated with RDQM. Channels connecting to this queue manager will reference this IP address rather than the IP address of any of the servers. |
Quick question on using the Floating IP in RDQM. Can multiple queue managers share the same floating IP given that each queue managers listen on different port? |
As there is guarantee that they're running on the same of the three servers, they should each have their own floating IP. Obviously you want them on a different port so should they happen to co-exist on the same server there is no conflict... 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2020 5:18 am Post subject: Re: May be dumb question about RDQM |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| fjb_saper wrote: |
| As there is guarantee that they're running on the same of the three servers, they should each have their own floating IP. Obviously you want them on a different port so should they happen to co-exist on the same server there is no conflict... |
I think you mean "as there is no guarantee"
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2020 9:22 am Post subject: Re: May be dumb question about RDQM |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20763
Location: LI,NY
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| fjb_saper wrote: |
| As there is guarantee that they're running on the same of the three servers, they should each have their own floating IP. Obviously you want them on a different port so should they happen to co-exist on the same server there is no conflict... |
I think you mean "as there is no guarantee" |
Indeed the mind was faster than the fingers
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
