Author |
Message
|
dl123z |
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:35 am Post subject: Differences MqsiPackageBar IIB v9 and ConfigManagerProxy.jar |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 25 Oct 2018 Posts: 8
|
Hello guys,
I'm trying to develop an IC project that usually use Toolkit to package and deploy BAR.
I was testing with IIB v9 Developer version from IBM Website and I have successfully created a BAR file. But, My institution has its own version IIB v9 that they tell me that they have patched its version.
Is there a difference between my BAR File generated and the BAR File generated with the version that my institution has?
Another question, I have found this guide:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSMKHH_9.0.0/com.ibm.etools.mft.doc/ae33102_.htm
Does anyone have experience using that guide? If so, how can I use the commands for example: mqsipackagebar and mqsideploybar? Some examples would be very useful.
Thank you for your attention |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:54 am Post subject: Re: Differences MqsiPackageBar IIB v9 and ConfigManagerProxy |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
dl123z wrote: |
Is there a difference between my BAR File generated and the BAR File generated with the version that my institution has? |
Probably. If it makes a difference depends on what the versions are; typically bar files are compatible within major versions. The most likely problem will be if the bar file contains "new" nodes introduced in fix packs later than the level to which the bar is being deployed.
dl123z wrote: |
how can I use the commands for example: mqsipackagebar and mqsideploybar? |
Where in the link you posted does it mention mqsideploybar?
I think you want to be looking here instead. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dl123z |
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:10 pm Post subject: Re: Differences MqsiPackageBar IIB v9 and ConfigManagerProxy |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 25 Oct 2018 Posts: 8
|
Vitor wrote: |
Where in the link you posted does it mention mqsideploybar?
I think you want to be looking here instead. |
Somehow I managed to run the mqsipackagebar, but calling the class inside the jar file, but not calling strictly mqsipackagebar.bat (Windows) or mqsipackagebar (UNIX)
https://imgur.com/a/BujfHhV
Command:
Code: |
java -cp IntegrationApi.jar com.ibm.broker.config.appdev.FlowRendererBAR -a <nameBar.bar> -w <workspace> -k <ProjectName> |
It makes me think that it is only necessary to have the JAR file and not import the files (mqsipackagebar, mqsideploybar) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 4:54 am Post subject: Re: Differences MqsiPackageBar IIB v9 and ConfigManagerProxy |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
dl123z wrote: |
It makes me think that it is only necessary to have the JAR file and not import the files (mqsipackagebar, mqsideploybar) |
Try reading the link I posted.  _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dl123z |
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2018 9:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 25 Oct 2018 Posts: 8
|
Vitor wrote: |
Try reading the link I posted.  |
I've already read the link and I've found the answer. Thanks for the help
Quote: |
The API requires the WebSphere® MQ Classes for Java for connectivity |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|