| Author |
Message
|
| PBS12 |
 Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2019 7:55 am Post subject: Migrate from IIB 9 to IIB 10 vs AppConnect |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 12 Nov 2018
Posts: 9
|
We have IIB 9.0.0.7 running in our environments.
We are planning to migrate from 9 to either 10 or 11.
What would be the better option.
9 to 10?
or
9 to 11 diretcly?
I feel its better to go with stable version of 10 rather than going for most latest version.
Any Thoughts? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2019 9:31 am Post subject: Re: Migrate from IIB 9 to IIB 10 vs AppConnect |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26015
Location: Texas, USA
|
| PBS12 wrote: |
| I feel its better to go with stable version of 10 rather than going for most latest version. |
Then you should do that. Seriously.
The decision is based principally on your site's appetite for risk, how quickly your site upgrades, how disruptive the upgrade will be at your site, etc. etc. There's no right or wrong answer, just the right answer for you.
FWIW my site planned to move from 9 to 10 for what sounds like similar thinking to you. Then we got into the planning, the migration strategy, the testing and management said:
| Quote: |
Contact admin this! We're not doing this to go to 10, then do it again in a year or two to go to 11! The customers don't have time to do two tests! We'll take the risk, go straight to 11. And we'll build it on RHEL 7 not 6, so that'll save another migration. So that means we can use MQv9.
Still doable by the end of 2019 though, yes? |
So glad I don't sit near the platform engineering team any more.
The point being, typically risk is a top priority here. Having weighed it, we went a different way. I don't think that's wrong and the platform people have lots of automation to help them........ 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PBS12 |
| Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2019 12:03 pm Post subject: Migrate from IIB 9 to IIB 10 vs AppConnect |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 12 Nov 2018
Posts: 9
|
Do the consuming applications have to re-generate their stubs for SOAP services over IIB9, once we migrate from IIB 9 to 10 or ACE 11?
Does IBM recommend to must re-generate stubs for existing SOAP services built in IIB 9? Will they face any issues if they don't re-generate their stubs and hit same SOAP web services which now running on latest version? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| HubertKleinmanns |
| Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:00 am Post subject: Re: Migrate from IIB 9 to IIB 10 vs AppConnect |
|
|
Shaman
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 732
Location: Germany
|
| PBS12 wrote: |
| Does IBM recommend to must re-generate stubs for existing SOAP services built in IIB 9? Will they face any issues if they don't re-generate their stubs and hit same SOAP web services which now running on latest version? |
Ask IBM, what they recommend  .
_________________
Regards
Hubert |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| gauripuri |
| Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:50 am Post subject: general discussion |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 12 Nov 2019
Posts: 1
|
Thanks for the information.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
clinical research courses in pune
Last edited by gauripuri on Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:48 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| timber |
| Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Aug 2015
Posts: 1127
|
| Quote: |
| Do the consuming applications have to re-generate their stubs for SOAP services over IIB9, once we migrate from IIB 9 to 10 or ACE 11? |
Not usually. The whole point of SOAP (and any other API) is that the client and server are decoupled. Upgrading the server should not require changes in the clients.
What makes you think that IIB would be any different? Are there other changes happening at the same time as the upgrade, and would those changes affect the clients? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
