| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Aggregation flows additional instances |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| Armageddon123 |
 Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:19 pm Post subject: Aggregation flows additional instances |
 |
|
Acolyte
Joined: 11 Feb 2014
Posts: 61
|
Hi All,
IIB9.0.0.6
I need one help on IIB aggregation flow. we had a requirement to implement aggregation of multiple responses which was done with aggregation nodes. flows seems fine working in SIT and going to Performance Test Env. Also followed a common pattern in this client flows to keep additional instance as 3. Did not notice anything problem in my testing etc. All of a sudden , came across two KC links.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSKM8N_8.0.0/com.ibm.etools.mft.doc/ac12300_.htm
| Quote: |
| Do not deploy multiple copies of the same fan-in flow either to the same or to different execution groups. |
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSMKHH_9.0.0/com.ibm.etools.mft.doc/ac12311_.htm
| Quote: |
| Do not deploy a fan-in flow to multiple integration servers on the same broker |
This sounded some what alarming to me, It is bad that I never saw this before.Went and did some testing with deploying flows in 2 EGs and each has 3 additional instances on it. Did not notice any issues.
I am thinking, this is a typo information in the KC. because no other nodes have these restrait of not allowing deploy in multiple EGs to process more requests
Have any of you faced this mentioned issue in flows really..?
Any thoughts are greatful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
If you did not test under stress i.e. more than a few concurrent aggregations, you may not see any unpredictable results. You should also have 5 or more replies in a single aggregation for your stress testing... 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Armageddon123 |
| Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 11 Feb 2014
Posts: 61
|
Thanks fjb_saper
let me try out some more loading testing, we have 2 or 3 backend response to aggregate at max depending on req paramter.
Could you please share the link which says the constraint of 5 or more to replicate the issue, In that case, it should be fine as we have 2 r 3 max. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| Armageddon123 wrote: |
Thanks fjb_saper
let me try out some more loading testing, we have 2 or 3 backend response to aggregate at max depending on req paramter.
Could you please share the link which says the constraint of 5 or more to replicate the issue, In that case, it should be fine as we have 2 r 3 max. |
There is no constraint for 5 or more. I just thought that it would be more observable, the more responses you get...
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
