| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Websphere MQ Integrator vs Websphere MQ Integrator Broker |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| zhaobin |
 Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:52 am Post subject: Websphere MQ Integrator vs Websphere MQ Integrator Broker |
 |
|
Novice
Joined: 29 Oct 2002
Posts: 20
|
Hi,
What is the difference between Websphere MQ Integrator and Websphere MQ Integrator Broker. Is Websphere MQ Integrator Broker = Websphere MQ Integrator - NEON Formatter - NEON Rules?
On the IBM Websphere MQ family website, I only find Websphere MQ Integrator Broker, but not Websphere MQ Integrator. Does it imply IBM is going to push Websphere MQ Integrator Broker and give up the name of Websphere MQ Integrator?
thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| yaakovd |
| Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 20 Jan 2003
Posts: 319
Location: Israel
|
You are rirht - it is very not clear from information on IBM site.
Documentaion is absolutelly identical for both.
Websphere MQ Integrator = Websphere MQ Integrator Broker + NEON Formatter + NEON Rules 
It is IBM's way to take out (step by step) NEON.
Actually new Websphere MQ Integrator Broker has most or may be all funktionality to replace NEON.
I guess also that it is different license for Event Broker --> Broker --> Integrator.
_________________
Best regards.
Yaakov
SWG, IBM Commerce, Israel |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| wmqiguy |
| Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2003 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 09 Oct 2002
Posts: 145
Location: Florida
|
This divorce has been in the works since NEON and IBM started dating. I saw it coming a long time ago. (I've worked for both.) 
I'm just wondering how much the alimony will be......but I digress on a subject I've ponificated on before.
Yaakovd, The MRM is getting close, but I've still seen cases where NEON...oops...NNSY still is the weapon of choice. Cases where you have indeterminate amount of repeats...or alternate formats. Also, do a quick performance check.
The risk is how much support it will receive in a year or two. Based on that risk alone, I would stick with the MRM as much as possible. Also, the learning curve is fairly steep for NNSY. Why learn something that will be gone soon?
I feel like the child of divorce.
Good Luck everyone!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| yaakovd |
| Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2003 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 20 Jan 2003
Posts: 319
Location: Israel
|
| wmqiguy wrote: |
This divorce has been in the works since NEON and IBM started dating. I saw it coming a long time ago. (I've worked for both.)
I feel like the child of divorce. |
Hello brother, don' fill alone 
I have same problem - our system is working with MQSI and NEON (for EDI parsing) more then 1 year in production, 50 000 EDI messages per day. But I will happy to switch back to MRM as soon as possible.
What is your choice - mother or father ?
_________________
Best regards.
Yaakov
SWG, IBM Commerce, Israel |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kirani |
| Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2003 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 05 Sep 2001
Posts: 3779
Location: Torrance, CA, USA
|
While working with NEON we found that it worked slower than MRM, but it's a great tool to model some of the complex message structure. Also, there was a problem with using NEON nodes in Globally coordinated message flows, this problem must have been solved by now.
_________________
Kiran
IBM Cert. Solution Designer & System Administrator - WBIMB V5
IBM Cert. Solutions Expert - WMQI
IBM Cert. Specialist - WMQI, MQSeries
IBM Cert. Developer - MQSeries
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
