| Author |
Message
|
| sathsiva |
 Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 12:42 am Post subject: queuemanager alert via email |
 |
|
Centurion
Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 125
|
Hi,
Is there any standard scripting or coding is avliable to alert via email if queuemanager is down pls.
Regards,
Sathish
_________________
kcs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
This sort of thing is normally carried out by one of the monitoring tools that exist for MQ (and IIB, WAS etc). These are not part of the standard product.
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sathsiva |
| Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 2:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 125
|
We are able to use the monitoring tool for the MQ.But the email notification is not there with that tool.Any idea how to configure the email notification with mq. Thanks.
_________________
kcs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5849
Location: UK
|
"the" monitoring tool? - which one would that be?
_________________
Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| sathsiva wrote: |
| Any idea how to configure the email notification with mq. |
Ask the monitoring tool vendor.
I find it implausible that someone has invented a monitoring tool which can (as an example) detect that a process has failed (like a queue manager) but didn't bother to equip the tool with a means of alerting anyone....... 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| venkataa |
| Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 08 Jan 2016
Posts: 7
|
Hi,
I don't think we have any standard script or app to monitor and alert through mail if QM/listener is down.
What i am doing is checking the status of listener process runmqlsr and sending mail using sendmail cmd(configured by Unix team) if it is not running. I set cron job to run every 5 minutes for that script.
We can check status of QM by checking it
s listener process or ping qmgr. ping qmgr requires permissions also to check where as listener process runmqlsr won't require any  .
Unix Script code
lsc=`ps -ef|grep runmqlsr|grep <QM_Name>|grep <Listener_Port>|grep -v grep |wc -l`
if [ $lsc -eq 0 ]
then
#Listener process count is 0
echo "Listener is not running with port "$lpo
echo "QM is Down is on "`hostname`|sendmail -s "QM DOWN" <receiver mail IDs>
else
#Listener process count is greater than 0
echo "Listener is running with port "$lpo
fi |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7717
|
A listener can be running and the queue manager can be 100% down.
A listener can be running and the queue manager can be up, but completely or partially unresponsive.
While it is worthwhile to monitor the listener, do not think you have an MQ monitor in place a this time.
Go to the Monitoring team at your company. They have one or more tools that monitor servers, databases, networks, etc. Ask them what capabilities they have in their existing tools to monitor MQ. Use that. If they say they have none, then ask them what the monitoring team's plan is to plug their monitoring gap?
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| venkataa wrote: |
What i am doing is checking the status of listener process runmqlsr and sending mail using sendmail cmd(configured by Unix team) if it is not running. I set cron job to run every 5 minutes for that script.
We can check status of QM by checking it
s listener process or ping qmgr. ping qmgr requires permissions also to check where as listener process runmqlsr won't require any . |
Respectfully, you can't check the queue manager status by checking the listener process. You can check the listener by checking the listener process.
If you want to check the queue manager in this way, you need to check more processes that just runmqlsr. I would recommend:
- amqzmuc0
- amqzmxa0
- amqzmuf0
Others may have a differing & longer list, but if any of these are not running, your queue manager is either down or in serious trouble. Of course any of these processes (including runmqlsr) can be running and there could still be an issue.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| venkataa |
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 08 Jan 2016
Posts: 7
|
| PeterPotkay wrote: |
A listener can be running and the queue manager can be 100% down.
A listener can be running and the queue manager can be up, but completely or partially unresponsive.
While it is worthwhile to monitor the listener, do not think you have an MQ monitor in place a this time.
Go to the Monitoring team at your company. They have one or more tools that monitor servers, databases, networks, etc. Ask them what capabilities they have in their existing tools to monitor MQ. Use that. If they say they have none, then ask them what the monitoring team's plan is to plug their monitoring gap? |
Unfortunately we don't have any monitoring team, We have to support 24/7 shit wise.
I believe there is no use of QM, if its listener not running. I never seen Listener still running when QM already down. That's why i am following this approach to monitor my QM. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| venkataa |
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 08 Jan 2016
Posts: 7
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| venkataa wrote: |
What i am doing is checking the status of listener process runmqlsr and sending mail using sendmail cmd(configured by Unix team) if it is not running. I set cron job to run every 5 minutes for that script.
We can check status of QM by checking it
s listener process or ping qmgr. ping qmgr requires permissions also to check where as listener process runmqlsr won't require any . |
Respectfully, you can't check the queue manager status by checking the listener process. You can check the listener by checking the listener process.
If you want to check the queue manager in this way, you need to check more processes that just runmqlsr. I would recommend:
- amqzmuc0
- amqzmxa0
- amqzmuf0
Others may have a differing & longer list, but if any of these are not running, your queue manager is either down or in serious trouble. Of course any of these processes (including runmqlsr) can be running and there could still be an issue. |
Thanks. I will add the above processes also to monitor including runmqlsr. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5849
Location: UK
|
| sathsiva wrote: |
| We are able to use the monitoring tool for the MQ.But the email notification is not there with that tool.Any idea how to configure the email notification with mq. Thanks. |
Start by answering the question "what do you mean by THE monitoring tool"?
Also - don't ask questions and then disappear - it is RUDE.
_________________
Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7717
|
| venkataa wrote: |
I believe there is no use of QM, if its listener not running. |
Not true. New inbound channels will not start, that is true. But outbound channels can still start without a Listener. Already running inbound channels can still run without a MQ Listener. And all processes that need to MQ that don't rely on MQ channels can still run without the MQ Listener.
| venkataa wrote: |
| I never seen Listener still running when QM already down. |
Sooner or later you will.
Its not bad to monitor the Listener. But don't think its a replacement for properly monitoring the queue manager.
Monitoring for the presence of a process may be better than nothing, but never forget that a process can exist yet be in a hung status.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
Last edited by PeterPotkay on Tue Jan 19, 2016 7:26 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2016 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20696
Location: LI,NY
|
| PeterPotkay wrote: |
Existing inbound channels can still run without a MQ Listener. And all processes that need to MQ that don't rely on MQ channels can still run without the MQ Listener.
|
I would like to amend here
| Quote: |
| Existing inbound channels |
to
| Quote: |
| Already running inbound channels |
. 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2016 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7717
|
| fjb_saper wrote: |
| PeterPotkay wrote: |
Existing inbound channels can still run without a MQ Listener. And all processes that need to MQ that don't rely on MQ channels can still run without the MQ Listener.
|
I would like to amend here
| Quote: |
| Existing inbound channels |
to
| Quote: |
| Already running inbound channels |
. |
Thanks, I agree that is clearer. I corrected my original post.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Mo |
| Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2016 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 02 Apr 2010
Posts: 13
Location: IL USA
|
| Would be a bad idea to run a shell script to verify the dspmq command, and report of status is anything other than running |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
